[joshyorko]

Summary

• Add automated acceptance coverage for two independent native homes, including concurrent startup, separate runtime paths and SQLite stores, CLI/MCP status and recall, lifecycle isolation, conflict safety, and recovery.
• Import only synthetic native Codex memory fixtures; compare full logical SQLite snapshots around preview and record/source/provenance snapshots across repeat apply.
• Fix native endpoint resolution so partial --host/--port overrides preserve the unspecified component of an inherited bind while replacing stale persisted endpoints.
• Harden the Dakota wrapper with a clean environment, make both documented port probes use MEMORYD_CODEX_PORT, add matching --bind to runbook initialization, and fix the recall jq filter to read .data // ..
• Bound Linux test cleanup with nonblocking waitpid(WNOHANG); the timeout starts when shutdown is requested.

PRs #261–#265 were checked for overlap. No directly matching issue was found, so no issue was created or linked.

Validation

• cargo test --test native_instance_isolation -- --nocapture — 4 passed.
• scripts/v0.1-release-gate.sh --artifact-dir /tmp/codex-memoryd-dakota-review-two-findings — passed: 572 tests across 48 result groups, zero failures; formatting, whitespace, release build, doctor, eval, performance, and dry-run checks passed.
• Optional operator dogfood checks were skipped by the gate’s default mode.

Safety boundary

All test records and native memory files are synthetic and temporary. No Dakota access or deployment, Friday service/store/config/port/systemd change, private-data transfer, cloud migration, Devsy change, database reset, provider writeback, or Codex config mutation was performed. Native Codex memory remains available as fallback.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-14T11:08:23.570755Z	60e96e6	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4e5bbfcbc3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 60e96e66bf

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".