Repository navigation
feat(platform): add project teams - #328
Conversation
ec73abf to
7d6227a
Compare
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f74765c20e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
f74765c to
92c037c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 92c037c27c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0b3cfd547b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8b0b1abd53
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8b0b1abd53
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ac00196105
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bbe84866d6
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 78bcb50570
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Project deletion could remain stuck in `deleting` when AI Analytics was unavailable. Invitation commands could also contact an old linked platform, the landing page gave unsupported relinking instructions, and expired invitation renewals could exceed the pending-invitation cap. This fixes the acceptance regressions found after #328. ## Changes - Persist the detached ownership window, last usage sample, and retry alarm atomically so deletion and transfer can finish during Analytics outages. Reconcile later, retain useful provider errors, and handle billing rollover and deleted accounts. - Resolve account-scoped invitation commands against the selected platform with origin-bound credentials. Preserve existing project links and explain the supported onboarding flow. - Enforce the 100-live-invitation cap for creation, refresh, and resend under the project lock. - Show project roles, reject reader deployment targets before building, and provide recovery commands for failed invitation email delivery and invalid invitations. - Add regression coverage and update collaboration documentation. ## Validation - Core build, repository formatting/lint, platform type-aware lint, and all 28 tracked workspace type checks passed. - Complete platform suite with a fresh UTC database cache: **4,247 passed**, 15 PostgreSQL-gated tests skipped. - Isolated PostgreSQL 17.11: **210 passed, zero skipped**, including all 15 gated cases and invitation concurrency. Test server shutdown verified. - Broad SDK/platform run: **10,622 passed**; four assertions and one suite setup initially failed. Two assertions came from a cached database timezone mismatch, two required the new project-list preflight in the deployment mock, and kitchen-sink setup had stale local D1 migration history. The complete platform rerun, updated deployment integration (**3/3**), and fresh-D1 kitchen-sink rerun (**27/27**) passed. The broad suite was not rerun in its entirety afterward. - Canonical `vp run check` remains blocked by an unrelated ignored scratch app missing its TypeScript compiler dependency; tracked workspace checks pass. ## Staging follow-up These changes have not been deployed. Live multi-account invitation/role journeys, operator ownership transfer, and cleanup of the disposable staging QA project remain pending. The underlying provider-side Analytics failure still needs staging diagnosis; it no longer blocks deletion in the covered regression.
Summary
Verification
Known unrelated test failure
The unchanged Vue pages client form-identity assertions fail in both dev and preview. Both failures reproduce independently, and this branch changes none of the related Vue source, fixture, dependency, or configuration paths.