[Rush]

A signal query whose predicate is a class declared later in the file:

@Component({ selector: 'd-parent', template: '<ng-content />' })
export class DParent {
  panes = contentChildren(DPane);
}
@Component({ selector: 'd-pane', template: '' })
export class DPane {}

emitted setClassMetadata(DParent, ..., { panes: [{ type: i0.ContentChildren, args: [DPane, { isSignal: true }] }] }). setClassMetadata runs as soon as the class is defined, so in development builds DPane was read before its initialization: ReferenceError: Cannot access 'DPane' before initialization, which stops the app. (The query initializer itself is fine: it runs later.)

ngtsc's memberMetadataFromSignalQuery wraps the predicate in forwardRef unless it is a string or a call expression, for this reason; this does the same:

panes: [{ type: i0.ContentChildren, args: [i0.forwardRef(() => DPane), { isSignal: true }] }]

It applies whatever the declaration order, as in ngtsc. A string predicate (viewChildren('ref')) and decorator queries are left as written. One deliberate difference: a spread first argument (viewChild(...args)) isn't wrapped, since forwardRef(() => ...args) isn't valid JavaScript.

tests/signal_query_metadata_forward_ref_test.rs checks both declaration orders, an options object ({ ...{ read: ElementRef }, isSignal: true }), a string predicate and decorator queries against @angular/compiler-cli 21.0.1's output.

[Brooooooklyn]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 06efd1888e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-22T12:52:46.032653Z	06efd18	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.