Skip to content

docs: note jj fallback in repo inference review convention #327

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
detail-app wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs: note jj fallback in repo inference review convention #327

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion REVIEW.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ Conventions that require human judgment during review. Lint-enforced rules
- `--format json` must produce valid JSON. Never mix human-readable text (hints,
update notices) into JSON output — guard behind a format check.
- New commands that accept a `repo` positional should make it optional and fall
back to inferring `owner/repo` from the git remote.
back to inferring `owner/repo` from the git or jj remote (see
`src/utils/vcs.rs`).

## Generated code

Expand Down
Loading