Repository navigation
Conversation
Keep #965 at its review pin. This adds a patch generator, not applied manuscript edits. Full source blobs are pinned; altered/missing/duplicate contexts refuse before any patch is emitted. The generator never writes the checkout. Local 36 fragment/guard tests pass normally and under -O with identical output; Python compilation passes. Full-checkout application, corpus-wide propagation, builds, kernel witnesses and independent review remain outstanding. No merge or scientific-status upgrade.
This was referenced Oct 27, 2026
amaybaum
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2026
Applies the independent review of 97d5b37 (accept with changes). - Family qualifier (blocking). F = K T0^-1 Pi_- + T0 Pi_+ is local, anticommutes with eps and squares to K for every (C, alpha), so chirality constrains C only within Lemma 3a's family. The alpha = 1 center-free mass statement now carries "within Lemma 3a's family" and "for d >= 2" in the SM Remark, the ROADMAP, the track README and the script verdict. New check G6 verifies F exactly at d = 2 and 3. - Proposition 3b states the family hypothesis, lambda != 0, characteristic 0 and even extents >= 4. - Lemma 3a: extents >= 4 for the coefficient identification. - Theorem 3: C = +-m^2 with a0 = 1. - Remark: "this lemma" is named as Lemma 3a or Theorem 3. - SM §4.2, "the two roles of the dynamics": the Susskind factorization is massless at alpha = 1/d and massive at the unit coefficient within the family. Added to the dependents table. - "Scope in the chain": the closing sentence becomes a plain status statement with the same content, which SC-17's ch05 :95 cites. The ledger re-affirms SM:L-3a, SM:T-3 and SM:P-3b at their new fingerprints, with levels unchanged. The track output is regenerated and byte-identical under -O. SM .tex/.pdf rebuilt. The two #966 fixes are listed as pending the owner's route decision and are not applied. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
amaybaum
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2026
Owner decision (owner, 2026-10-27): SC-32's theorem correction is the route; #965 is credited as the first step of Proposition 3b; #966's two documentation fixes are adopted; #966's SM replacement is not adopted. SM:T-3 is downgraded K2 -> K1, and no upgrade is made without a corresponding machine-checked theorem. - OI_Structural_Core.lean:413, center_anticommutator docstring: "zero iff the center terms vanish" -> "an identity, not coefficient uniqueness" (#966's text). Comment only: with comments and docstrings stripped the code is byte-identical, and the file has 551 lines before and after. - structural_chain_probe.py, C3 docstring and print, take #966's text. The AST is identical excluding the module docstring and print calls. The output under python3 -I differs only in the C3 print line. - Track README: records the owner decisions with author and time, and the precise proof coverage. Staggered.factorization covers unit coefficients and abstract generators. center_anticommutator is an identity with {D, eps} = 0 as a hypothesis. SM:L-3a and SM:P-3b have no kernel witness of the statement. The fixes are credited to #966. - LEDGER.json: the SM:T-3 note states the same coverage and the owner decision. Level K1 and the ID are kept, and no other row changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
Owner
Author
|
Closing without merge: the owner chose SM Theorem 3 Route A (Workstream D audit on #946; owner decision of 2026-10-31). This PR's generator pins an old base and refuses to run on current
The branch and history are kept as provenance. Generated by Claude Code |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope and pins
Head:
f522e62f8f02fbaec6eeecbd5a1316683470c547.This is a concrete source-repair draft, stacked on SC-17 #963 at
81654257152d0efd2101b183aacef2e169959525because its Explainer and book edits share the affected paragraphs. It leaves the mathematical review object #965 atd2e01a3a2670dab1a0f613d2dcfb7193e2608e1aunchanged.The commit adds one patch generator, not applied manuscript edits. It contains exact old/new replacements for seven files and refuses to emit a patch unless all pinned full-file blobs, index entries, working copies and unique replacement contexts match. It never writes repository files or runs builds. A full checkout could not be fetched in this writer environment, so no full-file application, build or corpus closure is claimed.
Proposed changes
OI_Structural_Core.lean: comment-only removal of the unsupported coefficient-uniqueness gloss; line count preserved, no theorem/proof edit.structural_chain_probe.py: describe the separate mass and scalar-offset tests actually executed, not a universal converse. Numeric assertions and other computation must remain AST-identical after excluding top-level documentation and print calls.Checks actually performed
source_repair.py --self-test: 36 fragment/guard checks PASS, covering successful replacement and refusal of missing, duplicated or already-applied contexts. Normal and optimized Python outputs are byte-identical; Python compilation succeeds. These are patch-mechanics tests, not scientific evidence or a full-checkout test.Script SHA-256:
790276035135b949ab1a3eac838d97cd6e1e0dcebf7778d2717c2bb8db713d3b.Published Git blob
852857628422e33d48de65e30d26c59ccfd1e79cequals the locally tested file.Remaining work / no closure
No manuscript status, coverage tier, review gate, retirement decision or merge authorization changes. The source finding remains open. The agreed #918-first sequence and explicit exact-SHA approval remain in force; this stacked draft must be reconciled after its actual dependencies land.
Related: #965, #963, #946, #918.