Repository navigation
Conversation
…rate
SM §4.3 displayed center independence as equivalent to exact staggered
chirality. Both proof lines show one direction, and only on Theorem 1's
normalization alpha = 1/d.
- Lemma 3a: the rule's two-step operator is K(C,alpha) = B^2 - mu, with
mu = C - 2(1 - d alpha), {B, eps} = 0, and the staggered mass fixed
within the isotropic family.
- Theorem 3 (ID kept): at alpha = 1/d, C = 0 gives the massless chiral
operator, and a mass gives C = +-m^2.
- Proposition 3b: at fixed alpha = 1/d, chiral => C = 0.
- Remark: masslessness is C + 2 d alpha = 2, Corollary 1b's
constant-preserving normalization. C = 2(1-d) at alpha = 1 is chiral and
center-dependent, and C = 0 at alpha = 1 has m^2 = 2(d-1).
Ledger: SM:T-3 re-affirmed at K1 (was K2); SM:L-3a and SM:P-3b added at
K1; no ID retired. The ROADMAP §D bullet is corrected. Exact rational
checks, with their output, are in the SC32 track. SM .tex/.pdf rebuilt.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
Applies the independent review of 97d5b37 (accept with changes). - Family qualifier (blocking). F = K T0^-1 Pi_- + T0 Pi_+ is local, anticommutes with eps and squares to K for every (C, alpha), so chirality constrains C only within Lemma 3a's family. The alpha = 1 center-free mass statement now carries "within Lemma 3a's family" and "for d >= 2" in the SM Remark, the ROADMAP, the track README and the script verdict. New check G6 verifies F exactly at d = 2 and 3. - Proposition 3b states the family hypothesis, lambda != 0, characteristic 0 and even extents >= 4. - Lemma 3a: extents >= 4 for the coefficient identification. - Theorem 3: C = +-m^2 with a0 = 1. - Remark: "this lemma" is named as Lemma 3a or Theorem 3. - SM §4.2, "the two roles of the dynamics": the Susskind factorization is massless at alpha = 1/d and massive at the unit coefficient within the family. Added to the dependents table. - "Scope in the chain": the closing sentence becomes a plain status statement with the same content, which SC-17's ch05 :95 cites. The ledger re-affirms SM:L-3a, SM:T-3 and SM:P-3b at their new fingerprints, with levels unchanged. The track output is regenerated and byte-identical under -O. SM .tex/.pdf rebuilt. The two #966 fixes are listed as pending the owner's route decision and are not applied. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
… 1 (not only (B-m)(B+m)) (#946) SM :314 dropped 'only': over C, (B + m eps)^2 with m^2 = -2(d-1) also equals K. Both forms have m^2 = +-lambda mu != 0 for d >= 2, so the conclusion stands. SM :296 and ROADMAP name the (B-m)(B+m) form for m^2 = 2(d-1). SM rebuilt (148 pages). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
Owner decision (owner, 2026-10-27): SC-32's theorem correction is the route; #965 is credited as the first step of Proposition 3b; #966's two documentation fixes are adopted; #966's SM replacement is not adopted. SM:T-3 is downgraded K2 -> K1, and no upgrade is made without a corresponding machine-checked theorem. - OI_Structural_Core.lean:413, center_anticommutator docstring: "zero iff the center terms vanish" -> "an identity, not coefficient uniqueness" (#966's text). Comment only: with comments and docstrings stripped the code is byte-identical, and the file has 551 lines before and after. - structural_chain_probe.py, C3 docstring and print, take #966's text. The AST is identical excluding the module docstring and print calls. The output under python3 -I differs only in the C3 print line. - Track README: records the owner decisions with author and time, and the precise proof coverage. Staggered.factorization covers unit coefficients and abstract generators. center_anticommutator is an identity with {D, eps} = 0 as a hypothesis. SM:L-3a and SM:P-3b have no kernel witness of the statement. The fixes are credited to #966. - LEDGER.json: the SM:T-3 note states the same coverage and the owner decision. Level K1 and the ID are kept, and no other row changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
Applies the confirmation review of 86140ac. - README: Staggered.factorization is (sum_{i<n} A_i)^2 = sum_{i<n} S_i^2, with S_i = t_i - s_i, unit coefficients and abstract generators, no t·s = 1 and no site parity; A_sq is named. For SM:T-3, {B, eps} = 0 is not kernel-checked (only Chiral.anti_add) and the generator-parity anticommutation is exact finite algebra (G1). mass_square's hypotheses are stated exactly. - LEDGER: the SM:T-3 note carries the same coverage. The SM:L-3a note records that Staggered.factorization is never instantiated on the concrete lattice (only on Unit). Levels are unchanged, and SM:P-3b is untouched. - OI_Structural_Core.lean mass_square docstring: states the hypotheses and (D + m·eps)^2 = D^2 + m·m. It no longer quotes manuscript wording. Comment only: with comments stripped the code is byte-identical, and the file has 551 lines before and after. - structural_chain_probe.py :137 print: describes the first-order identities tested. The AST is identical excluding docstrings and print calls, and the output differs only in that line. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
No Lean theorem proves Proposition 3b or a consequence of it. The row keeps its probe (G4 T1, T2, G5) and records Chiral.center_anticommutator in its delta as the identity used in the proof's first line. Kernel coverage 32/118 -> 31/118. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
…eses of center_anticommutator in the ledger; {B, eps} = 0 named in L-3a's delta; K1 basis for T-3 stated (#946)
Optional findings (a)-(d) of the confirmation at 4f7ca2d. Record and ledger
text only; no grade changes (T-3 K1, L-3a K1, P-3b P; kernel 31/118).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
…t, full hypotheses) (#946) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
This was referenced Oct 27, 2026
Owner
Author
|
Closed unmerged.
Branch Generated by Claude Code |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Source-correction unit SC-32, from gate #946. The owner classed the SM Theorem 3 finding as critical.
Route decision pending (owner). #965 and #966 cover the same theorem. An independent review found:
#966's Lean docstring fix (
OI_Structural_Core.lean:413) and itsstructural_chain_probe.pyC3 docstring and print fix are correct. They are not applied here, pending the route choice.The flaw
SM §4.3 (main :300) displays "Center independence … is equivalent to exact chiral symmetry". Both lines of the proof prove one direction. The Remark's own rule, C = 2(1−d) at α = 1, is chiral but center-dependent, so the displayed converse is false.
The correction
SM:L-3a, new). K(C,α) = B² − μ with μ = C − 2(1 − dα), on even periodic extents (≥ 4 for the coefficient identification).SM:T-3). At α = 1/d, a center-free rule is the square of the massless staggered operator and has exact chiral symmetry. A mass m ≠ 0 gives C = ±m², with a₀ = 1.SM:P-3b, new). The converse within Lemma 3a's family at fixed α = 1/d, for λ ≠ 0, characteristic 0 and even extents ≥ 4.Downstream. Every dependent (SM :236, :296, :543, :563, :595) uses the proved direction on the α = 1/d branch. The book and Explainer sites carry α = 1/d through SC-17 (#963 at
e316cf92).Coverage.
SM:T-3goes from K2 to K1, because Lean certifies only the unit-coefficient factorization and the anticommutator identity. This downgrade needs the owner's acceptance.SM:L-3aandSM:P-3bare added at K1.Record.
verification/audits/manuscript/intro-corpus-audit-20261026/tracks/SC32-sm-theorem3/, containing the README andtheorem3_exact.py. The script runs exact rational checks for d = 1, 2, 3 at extents 4 and 6, with countercontrols and the G6 family control. Its output is byte-identical under-O.Verification
97d5b37c; REVISE (one word) at35720a21; ACCEPT at107d5d5e. The reviewer re-verified Lemma 3a and the F construction with their own exact code.lean-axioms, which runs in CI.coverage_checkpasses (130 statements), as doesedge_rigidity_probe. The added-lines and secrets scans are clean.Merge order. SM :296 sits one blank line below SC-28's SM :294 edit (#962), so the two must be checked together when both land.
Draft: merge only at an exact SHA the owner approves, by normal merge commit.
Related: #946, #965, #966, #963, #962.
Generated by Claude Code