Skip to content

docs: label the new changelog section 0.0.38, and record 0.0.37 - #49

Merged
Xerolux merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/changelog-0-0-38
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

docs: label the new changelog section 0.0.38, and record 0.0.37#49
Xerolux merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/changelog-0-0-38

Conversation

@Xerolux

@Xerolux Xerolux commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Correcting a mistake in #48.

I filed the language-policy changes under ## v0.0.37. That version was published on 2026-08-14, before any of them — so the section described changes that are not in the release it names. The CI dev build for the merge commit is already v0.0.38-dev.43b03bf, which is the version they actually ship in.

Two fixes:

  • The section is relabelled 0.0.38.
  • 0.0.37 gets a stub. It had no changelog section at all — its release notes came from pull request titles — so the file jumped from 0.0.38 straight to 0.0.36. A published version silently missing from the changelog is exactly the kind of gap the language policy work was meant to close.

pyproject.toml stays at 0.0.37: the release workflow computes the next version itself from the last tag (auto-patch), which is where the 0.0.38 dev build came from.

28 language-policy tests still pass.


Generated by Claude Code

I filed the language-policy changes under v0.0.37. That version was published
on 2026-08-14, before any of them - the CI dev build for the merge commit is
already named 0.0.38, which is the version they actually ship in.

v0.0.37 itself had no changelog section at all; its release notes came from
pull request titles. A stub records it so the file does not silently skip a
published version.
@Xerolux
Xerolux marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2026 11:44
@Xerolux
Xerolux merged commit 7debb8b into main Aug 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants