[bschoenmaeckers]

Alternative to #6560 to unblock CI

[Tpt]

nox-uv seems to be a small project (single author, last commit 5 months ago). Do we want to depend on it?

[bschoenmaeckers]

nox-uv seems to be a small project (single author, last commit 5 months ago). Do we want to depend on it?

It's in the nox docs so maybe its fine. We can also implement this behaviour ourselves (once I get the CI green).

[bschoenmaeckers]

@Tpt I've removed nox-uv

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will regress 1 benchmark

1 warning

⚠️ Base and head ran on different runner types

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runner types, so the changes might not come from the code. Run base and head on the same runner type, or use CodSpeed Macro Runners for more stable results.

Learn more about Macro Runners

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 141 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 6 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	into_bigint_big_positive	4.2 µs	4.7 µs	-10.57%
⚡	call_method_0	1.8 ms	1.6 ms	+14.21%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing bschoenmaeckers:nox-uv (72717fe) with main (26f9ec8)}

Footnotes

1. 6 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩