Repository navigation
Add native Spanish and Hungarian answer pages for 'which AI for debate prep' - #284
Merged
Merged
Conversation
/es/mejor-ia-para-preparar-un-debate and /hu/melyik-ai-a-legjobb-vitara are written for Spanish and Hungarian debaters, not translated. Each has its own layout, a worked case in the plain case format, and competitor facts from the competitors' own sites, checked October 30, 2026. /best-ai-for-debate and the two pages name each other with hreflang (x-default is the English page). The first Hungarian guide now answers "which AI is good for what" and links the new comparison, so the two do not target the same question. The Spanish tools hub links the new Spanish page. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This was referenced Oct 30, 2026
The Spanish page is now a four-step prep guide (motion, case, replies, timed practice) with a decision at each step, a "¿ChatGPT o una herramienta de debate?" section and one "Qué herramienta para cada paso" table. It names DebateOwl, ChatGPT, Claude and two Spanish tools whose own sites were checked today: Socrátiko and Debatly. The Hungarian page is now questions and answers for school debaters and teachers, with a "Ha… akkor…" list and no table, and names no Hungarian competitor. /es and /hu link their page from the guide hub, the Hungarian tools hub links its page, and llms.txt lists both under ## Compare with English blurbs. The jargon check also catches "garantía" and "érvelési keret". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Programcode
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 30, 2026 19:27
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Task 1 of the 30 Oct Cody spec. Stacked: #285 and #286 build on this branch. Merge this one first.
What this adds
/es/mejor-ia-para-preparar-un-debateis written in Spanish as a step-by-step prep guide. It opens with an answer block for "¿Qué IA sirve para preparar un debate?" whose first sentence names DebateOwl. Then come four steps ("Paso 1: analizar la moción", "Paso 2: escribir el caso", "Paso 3: preparar las respuestas", "Paso 4: practicar con tiempo"), each ending in a decision. After that: "¿ChatGPT o una herramienta de debate?", one "Qué herramienta para cada paso" table (DebateOwl, ChatGPT, Claude, Socrátiko, Debatly), FAQs and sources. The worked case uses the plain format (opening, arguments with evidence and why they matter, "Si dicen… respondemos…", closing). The page says the app and the AI output are in Spanish, and it links all four Spanish tools by name./hu/melyik-ai-a-legjobb-vitarais a Hungarian Q&A for school debaters and teachers. Its sections are "Melyik AI a legjobb vitafelkészüléshez?", "Tud-e magyarul az AI vitapartner?", "Mit ír meg az AI, és mi marad rád?", "Mennyibe kerül?", "Mire nem jó az AI a vitában?" and "Hogyan használja egy tanár a vitaszakkörön?". It has a "Ha… akkor…" choice list and no table. It names no Hungarian competitor, only ChatGPT and Claude. It links the four Hungarian tools and /hu/mi-vitafelkeszules./best-ai-for-debateand both new pages carry the same set (en, es, hu, x-default pointing to the English page). The English page links both versions visibly./esand/hulink their page from the guide hub (GuideHub.tsx, newguideHub.nativeAnswerkey in all three locales). Both tools hubs link it too.llms.txtlists both under## Comparewith English blurbs that name the language.seo_comparison_pages.pynow also catches "contención", "garantía" and "érvelési keret".Changes to existing pages
/hu/mi-vitafelkeszulesused to answer "Melyik MI a legjobb vitára?". It now asks "Melyik MI mire jó a vitára készülésben?" and links the new page, so the two pages don't target the same query.Checked against the acceptance criteria
lang="es"andlang="hu". The sitemap went from 62 to 64 URLs in the build.Sources (checked October 30, 2026)
I left out Contradicto because its site is in English. I didn't check the Hungarian competitors (superdebate, talknative, dragondebate, debatify, Contra), so the Hungarian page names none of them.
Checks
Run on this head:
generate_seo_content.py,check_templating.py(9 pages),npm run seo:jargon,npm run lint,npm run typecheck,npm test(94 passed), andnpm run buildwithNODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=3072(prerender, sitemap, check-site, check-links). All passed. I skippednpm run verifybecause the spec asks for light checks.🤖 Generated with Claude Code