Skip to content

Keep the methods paper separate from provisional population estimates - #6

Merged
MaxGhenis merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
max/spm-paper-launch-cleanup-20260913
Sep 13, 2026
Merged

MaxGhenis merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
max/spm-paper-launch-cleanup-20260913

Conversation

@MaxGhenis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The methods discussion includes a historical population sensitivity whose saved receipt cannot support an exact replay. Remove that numerical illustration from the discussion and retain its provenance limitation in the reproducibility appendix. Clearly label the separate README poverty prediction as a dated development estimate, pending comparison on the final qualified release.

The frozen forecasts, predictions, tables and timestamp records are unchanged. The artifact guard retains the archived numerical check and no longer requires that illustration in current prose.

Validation: artifact guard and all 36 tests passed; HTML and the 18-page PDF rendered successfully; changed pages were visually checked. All 42 frozen data/table files match the base revision.

@MaxGhenis
MaxGhenis marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2026 14:32
@MaxGhenis
MaxGhenis merged commit bcc40c3 into master Sep 13, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant