feat: add uploader and application detail pages - #8
Conversation
BK1031
commented
Sep 1, 2026
BK1031
commented
- Add access-scoped aggregate statistics for individual uploaders and applications
- Add paginated, searchable file listings filtered by uploader entity or application client
- Add detail pages with Sentinel names, avatars, application icons, bucket breakdowns, and upload history
- Link dashboard uploader and application rankings to their detail pages
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 15b22b1035
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| nextOffset := offset + limit | ||
| page.Files = files[:limit] | ||
| page.NextOffset = &nextOffset |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When an upload becomes active between page requests, advancing this numeric offset against ListFiles' live created_at desc ordering shifts every older row, so the next page repeats an item from the previous page while the newly inserted file remains absent from the concatenated results. Equal timestamps also make the ordering nondeterministic. Use a stable (created_at, id) ordering with a cursor or snapshot boundary so loading more cannot produce duplicate or missing entries.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
