Support agentless log submission for Log4j 1 by daniel-mohedano · Pull Request #12728 · DataDog/dd-trace-java

daniel-mohedano · 2026-10-02T09:17:04Z

What Does This Do

Last PR of the agentless log submission stack. It adds Log4j 1.

When agentless log submission is enabled, a second advice on Category.callAppenders(LoggingEvent) submits each event once.
- It runs after the level check and before any appender, including async ones.
- The user context comes from the Log4j 1 MDC.
The Log4j 1 correlation modules are now context tracking modules, so MDC injection also works with CI Visibility when tracing is disabled.
The log injection smoke tests now assert direct submission for Log4j 1 backends.

Stack:

Logback (Support agentless log submission for Logback #12725)
Shared submission helper and JBoss LogManager (Support agentless log submission for JBoss LogManager #12726)
tinylog 2 (Support agentless log submission for tinylog #12727)
Log4j 1 (this PR) (Support agentless log submission for Log4j 1 #12728)

Motivation

See the first PR of the stack. Log4j 1 already had correlation, but nothing submitted its events with agentless submission.

Additional Notes

log4j-over-slf4j replaces Category, so bridged applications are handled by the target backend. The smoke tests check that no events are duplicated.
The NDC is not submitted.
Nothing changes when agentless log submission is disabled, except the MDC injection fix above.

Testing:

Forked JUnit 5 instrumentation tests on 1.2.4 and latest. They cover:
- submission with levels and exceptions
- user MDC and collisions, child spans, no active span
- additivity, async delivery
- injection disabled, CI Visibility with tracing disabled
:dd-smoke-tests:log-injection:test and Muzzle pass.

Jira ticket: SDTEST-3805

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T09:30:18Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - sbt-scalatest

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	58.26	57.69	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.57	56.55	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.71	56/310
agentEvpProxy	58.01	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	-

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

datadog-prod-us1-6 · 2026-10-02T09:32:05Z

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 59.70% (-0.00%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 2948c37 | Docs | Give us feedback!}

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T09:33:30Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - nebula-release-plugin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	35.85	37.15	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.30	37.15	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.30	29/169
agentless	37.06	37.15	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.09	36.42	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.64	29/142
agentlessCodeCoverage	45.76	45.38	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.38	45.38	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.38	29/141
agentlessLineCoverage	56.80	56.55	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.25	56.55	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.25	28/140

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T09:34:52Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - netflix-zuul

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	90.67	91.39	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.72	89.58	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.09	29/170
agentless	82.17	82.69	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.52	82.69	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.52	29/140
agentlessCodeCoverage	98.70	97.04	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.66	97.04	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.66	29/140
agentlessLineCoverage	111.54	113.88	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.34	113.88	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.34	29/141

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T09:36:54Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - heliboard

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	10.49	9.92	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.57	9.92	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.57	27/137

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T09:38:11Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - pass4s

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	8.38	10.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.16	10.13	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.75	30/164
agentless	8.59	10.33	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.74	9.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.14	29/134
agentlessCodeCoverage	18.21	18.45	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.24	17.73	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.48	25/123

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T09:39:01Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - reactive-streams-jvm

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	23.96	22.54	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.42	22.09	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.87	30/169
agentless	20.83	19.59	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.24	19.59	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.24	29/136
agentlessCodeCoverage	20.94	20.39	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.55	19.99	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.95	29/136
agentlessLineCoverage	27.76	26.98	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.78	26.98	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.78	19/90

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

dd-octo-sts · 2026-10-02T09:42:22Z

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite	Status
Startup	🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results

Scenario	Candidate	master	Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent	13.93 s	13.90 s	[-0.5%; +0.9%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent	12.85 s	12.99 s	[-1.9%; -0.3%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent	17.10 s	17.00 s	[-0.4%; +1.6%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent	16.92 s	16.96 s	[-1.1%; +0.7%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent	16.81 s	16.40 s	[-2.2%; +7.2%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent	16.99 s	16.90 s	[-0.3%; +1.4%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent	16.07 s	16.11 s	[-1.1%; +0.7%] (no difference)

Commit: 2948c37b · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI

Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T09:42:35Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - sonar-kotlin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	13.60	13.67	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.07	13.40	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.20	29/168
agentless	11.49	12.37	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.88	12.12	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.63	29/138
agentlessCodeCoverage	14.39	15.72	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.33	15.41	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.02	29/138
agentlessLineCoverage	16.49	17.38	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.89	17.38	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.89	28/137

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T09:45:05Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - jolokia

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	94.07	95.12	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.05	95.12	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.05	30/169
agentless	90.80	91.39	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.59	89.58	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.22	29/140
agentlessCodeCoverage	100.09	101.00	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.91	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.09	29/141
agentlessLineCoverage	100.88	103.04	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.16	101.00	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.12	32/146

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T09:53:37Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - okhttp

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	21.15	19.59	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.56	19.99	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.16	29/169
agentless	19.84	18.82	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.02	19.59	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.25	30/142
agentlessCodeCoverage	23.34	22.09	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.25	22.99	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.35	31/145
agentlessLineCoverage	40.04	38.67	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.37	39.45	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.59	29/140

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T10:00:39Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - spring_boot

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	16.25	16.36	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.11	16.36	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.11	29/165
agentless	9.88	9.92	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.04	9.92	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.04	29/137
agentlessCodeCoverage	14.26	13.67	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.59	13.67	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.59	29/139
agentlessLineCoverage	22.73	22.54	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.19	22.54	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.19	29/138

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-10-02T10:16:34Z

CI Visibility Test Environment - sonar-java

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	17.31	17.38	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.07	15.41	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.90	29/167
agentless	48.41	16.69	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +31.72	13.67	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +34.74	29/139
agentlessCodeCoverage	125.95	95.12	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +30.83	81.05	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +44.90	29/139
agentlessLineCoverage	161.45	123.36	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +38.09	123.36	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +38.09	29/142

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-10-05T12:37:57Z

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-05T12:53:00.811406Z	`0d1b1a6`	Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-05T13:01:55.761179Z	`0d1b1a6`	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0d1b1a6afc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

datadog-prod-us1-6

Forwarded or deserialized Log4j events are submitted with the receiver thread’s MDC rather than the event’s captured MDC, dropping producer correlation fields and potentially attaching unrelated context.

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit 0d1b1a6 · @DataDog review to ask questions}

datadog-staging-us1-crawler-test

More details

The Log4j 1 submission path is covered by targeted instrumentation changes and preserves existing behavior, including MDC context and recursion avoidance. No introduced correctness issue was identified in the reviewed diff.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit 42e4378}

datadog-staging-us1-crawler-test

More details

The Log4j 1 agentless submission path follows the existing instrumentation pattern and the reviewed diff introduced no reportable correctness issue. Production telemetry was unavailable by workflow, and targeted Gradle execution was blocked by a sandbox certificate/network error.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit 42e4378}

datadog-prod-us1-6

The two most critical issues are: (1) LogsIntakeHelper reads the live thread MDC instead of the snapshot already captured on the LoggingEvent, causing agentless submissions to lose or overwrite the event's original MDC fields; and (2) the submission guard in CategoryInstrumentation is held for the entire callAppenders execution, meaning any re-entrant log event fired by a synchronous appender or layout is silently dropped regardless of its eligibility.

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit ed01325}

daniel-mohedano added type: feature Enhancements and improvements comp: ci visibility Continuous Integration Visibility tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM comp: logs Logs Product labels Oct 2, 2026

This was referenced Oct 2, 2026

Support agentless log submission for Logback #12725

Open

Support agentless log submission for JBoss LogManager #12726

Open

Support agentless log submission for tinylog #12727

Open

daniel-mohedano added this pull request to stack #12729 October 2, 2026 09:20

daniel-mohedano force-pushed the daniel.mohedano/agentless-logs-log4j1 branch from 3d65fef to 0775202 Compare October 2, 2026 09:43

daniel-mohedano force-pushed the daniel.mohedano/agentless-logs-log4j1 branch from 0775202 to 0d1b1a6 Compare October 2, 2026 10:48

daniel-mohedano marked this pull request as ready for review October 5, 2026 12:37

daniel-mohedano requested review from a team as code owners October 5, 2026 12:37

daniel-mohedano removed the request for review from a team October 5, 2026 12:37

daniel-mohedano requested review from ValentinZakharov, amarziali and mhlidd and removed request for a team October 5, 2026 12:37

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Oct 5, 2026

View reviewed changes

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot reviewed Oct 5, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread ...n/log4j/log4j-1.2.4/src/main/java/datadog/trace/instrumentation/log4j1/LogsIntakeHelper.java

daniel-mohedano requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2026 11:21

daniel-mohedano force-pushed the daniel.mohedano/agentless-logs-log4j1 branch from 0d1b1a6 to 42e4378 Compare October 6, 2026 11:21

daniel-mohedano removed the comp: logs Logs Product label Oct 6, 2026

datadog-staging-us1-crawler-test Bot reviewed Oct 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

daniel-mohedano requested a review from a team as a code owner October 15, 2026 10:35

daniel-mohedano force-pushed the daniel.mohedano/agentless-logs-log4j1 branch from 42e4378 to ed01325 Compare October 15, 2026 10:35

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot reviewed Oct 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread ...n/log4j/log4j-1.2.4/src/main/java/datadog/trace/instrumentation/log4j1/LogsIntakeHelper.java

Comment thread .../log4j-1.2.4/src/main/java/datadog/trace/instrumentation/log4j1/CategoryInstrumentation.java

daniel-mohedano added 4 commits October 15, 2026 14:07

feat(log4j1): support agentless log submission

6406d02

test(log4j1): migrate agentless log submission tests to JUnit 5

27fea37

test(log4j1): assert service, env and version in submitted events

bfd8517

fix(log4j1): submit events logged by appenders during callAppenders

2948c37

daniel-mohedano force-pushed the daniel.mohedano/agentless-logs-log4j1 branch from ed01325 to 2948c37 Compare October 15, 2026 12:07

Conversation

daniel-mohedano commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - sbt-scalatest

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited by datadog-official Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - nebula-release-plugin

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - netflix-zuul

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - heliboard

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - pass4s

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - reactive-streams-jvm

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - sonar-kotlin

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - jolokia

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - okhttp

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - spring_boot

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Visibility Test Environment - sonar-java

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codex Review Summary

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

datadog-staging-us1-crawler-test Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

datadog-staging-us1-crawler-test Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot left a comment

daniel-mohedano commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited by datadog-official Bot

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading