Validate maintained provider contracts without credentials - #522
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Independent review
Claude Opus 5 reviewed the complete pre-release diff. The release candidate incorporates its actionable findings: version and changelog preparation, Vercel open-event output handling, conservative Vercel URL-fetch classification, extendable legacy option interfaces, consistent MCP call-admission options, corrected RevenueCat claims, stale schema-digest prose, and complete proxy audit coverage. Its unverified Notion live-catalog observation was not promoted into the credential-free contract; official docs remain the public check and unknown live tools still fail closed.
Verification
npm run release:checknpm run providers:checkCloses #521
Closes #520