Repository navigation
🐛🧑💻 - Progress scope assessment rejects an API requirement with scope clause limit in generated issue plan metadata #828
Description
Is there an existing issue for this?
- I have searched the existing issues.
The exact diagnostic search returned only unrelated closed setup issue #274. Related closed #774 improved rejected-progress diagnostics; this report concerns the new, explicit scope-clause-limit failure and recovery, not an absence of those diagnostics.
Which actions are affected?
Commits
Which platforms are affected?
Linux
Description
A completed progress scope result is rejected with scope-clause-limit at $.lines for source L119. Copilot retains existing progress and fails the consumer's commit verification before publishing a valid assessment, while the independent project CI Check passes.
The reported source anchor is inside the Action-maintained hidden recommendationState.implementationPlan.steps details in the consumer issue body. That is an observation about the anchor, not proof that metadata inclusion, the scope bound or the model caused the failure. Please investigate which input and returned clause count exceeded which bound, whether derived recommendation metadata is intended to become progress scope, and the supported recovery for this coherent issue. Keep fail-closed validation and prior progress.
This is one observed completed-result rejection. No deterministic reproduction rate, provider outage, malformed source requirement or causal link to application behavior is asserted. The diagnostic is now much more useful than the earlier #774 case; the remaining problem is reaching a valid bounded scope without changing consumer requirements or weakening acceptance.
Reproducing the issue
- Consumer issue: ✨🧑💻 - Implement Home Assistant identity and SQLite platform persistence domus#6; draft PR: Implement HA identity, SQLite persistence and verified restoration domus#7.
- Copilot - Commit run: https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41168137540, job https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41168137540/job/124440053296.
- Exact comparison: before 16999cd3635a8f475c04187e7e1e3c7caec83e86; after 780281e842142ec16c3c214cc7236582e59aa0e5. Run attempt 1, push event.
- The admitted codex-cli 0.166.0 agent completes, then scope validation rejects $.lines with reason scope-clause-limit and source L119. No verified requirement ID is available (requirement none).
- Native Copilot / Verification reports lifecycle blocked, error agent.failed, retryable Yes, reference fb65aecf-0fd2-457c-b788-551d7ce78afe. Existing progress is retained.
- At inspection, raw issue L117 is the generated step title "Expose the versioned identity API"; L119 is its details string: "Add validated FastAPI identity, household, member, and policy endpoints with safe error envelopes and no credential persistence or diagnostic leakage."
- Independent exact-head CI Check is green: https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41168141080. Copilot - Branch Sync and Copilot - Pull Request also succeeded. Draft review is neutral/skipped and is not treated as approval.
- No Copilot source, installed workflow/configuration, issue scope, coverage gate or managed branch was changed to bypass this failure.
copilot Version
vypdev/copilot@v3 resolves in the failing job setup to 3e7ceea. Agent runtime: codex-cli 0.166.0. Exact source revision is authoritative; no unverified package version is inferred.
Relevant Log Output
Download action repository 'vypdev/copilot@v3' (SHA:3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0)
BEFORE_SHA: 16999cd3635a8f475c04187e7e1e3c7caec83e86
AFTER_SHA: 780281e842142ec16c3c214cc7236582e59aa0e5
Agent execution admitted (codex codex-cli 0.166.0).
Agent execution completed.
Progress scope result was rejected (scope-clause-limit; field $.lines; requirement none; source L119). Existing progress was retained.
Error code: agent.failed
Action: Inspect the original requirement and response schema.
Details: phase scope, reason scope-clause-limit, field $.lines, requirement none, original issue line L119.
Retryable: Yes
Reference: fb65aecf-0fd2-457c-b788-551d7ce78afe
Additional context and comments
The consumer increment has 490 local tests (375 backend, 65 tooling, 39 architecture fixtures, 11 Node policy), 100% executable backend statement/branch coverage, unchanged 29 installed Copilot resource hashes, original SDD/catalog checks and matching green application CI. This does not establish scope-agent correctness or full M1 acceptance; the feature intentionally remains a draft.
Suggested investigation/acceptance:
- Pin the original issue snapshot and distinguish human normative scope from generated or excluded metadata before choosing a fix.
- Exercise a legitimate API requirement with several nouns/invariants, long and short human descriptions, hidden generated recommendation JSON, repeated source anchors, and adversarial over-splitting.
- Keep clause/count/input/output bounds explicit and tested; reject malformed or unsupported results without partial progress publication.
- If a bounded repair/retry is supported, preserve the complete scope, source identity, old progress and exact-head binding. Do not silently truncate requirements, accept invalid output, raise limits blindly or ask the consumer to split coherent work solely to obtain a green check.
- Expose safe actual count/limit/phase facts and a concrete supported next action where available, without raw rejected provider output or secrets.
- Separate this completed-result contract rejection from queue behavior, application test failures and optional check-publication errors.
This report requests upstream ownership only. Do not change the Domus consumer or its approved product scope as a workaround.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
- Status
Activity
[-]Progress scope assessment rejects an API requirement with scope-clause-limit in generated issue plan metadata[/-][+]🐛 - Progress scope assessment rejects an API requirement with scope clause limit in generated issue plan metadata[/+]vypbot commentedon Oct 31, 2026
Hi! I’m @vypbot, the Copilot assistant for this repository.
I can answer questions, explain the codebase, propose implementation and test plans, review issues and pull requests for potential bugs or security problems, and help authorized maintainers apply changes.
Try
/copilot helpto see the available commands, or mention @vypbot with your question.efraespada commentedon Oct 31, 2026
Historical report 6541225162 is preserved verbatim in the immutable transcript. It remains incident evidence; the issue and SDD define acceptance. Original body SHA-256:
9ffeef2f783a488b45e3ac8962ce2e84418fb2e6e92c593f85fe86cca2a2a965.efraespada commentedon Oct 31, 2026
Historical report 6541808229 is preserved verbatim in the immutable transcript. It remains incident evidence; the issue and SDD define acceptance. Original body SHA-256:
ad24d86eadc3ae3dbddd34dcd42510e1486f49fa962e6c42c520510b3821c39d.efraespada commentedon Oct 31, 2026
Historical report 6541906622 is preserved verbatim in the immutable transcript. It remains incident evidence; the issue and SDD define acceptance. Original body SHA-256:
c12ea42f2f5093e4fb413f0cd896aef9fa5ee6c6a168e3df4130e9a2609da954.efraespada commentedon Oct 31, 2026
Historical report 6542265502 is preserved verbatim in the immutable transcript. It remains incident evidence; the issue and SDD define acceptance. Original body SHA-256:
c98adc2fede78fe2e7fc439e6c4ebdec6b0731d4e005b30c402adf29fdbdd774.34 remaining items
efraespada commentedon Nov 1, 2026
Verified scope-clause-limit recurrence on Domus PR #15 at 6435decd55bfff32675d44e30f1d6a4e5d8eb161.
The original job log states:
I retrieved the current original issue body rather than guessing its line identity. L111 is exactly:
The bounded error supplies no verified requirement ID, actual emitted clause array, measured clause count or allowed count. I therefore cannot attribute the overflow to a particular generated clause or infer a numeric limit. This is phase scope/$.lines, distinct from the preceding 119e504 phase assessment/$.requirements failure now reported in #829 (reference 1925868e-6b1f-4e09-950c-97abe93ea7df).
No Copilot source, configuration, credentials, generated workflow, clause limit or verification rule changed. Domus continues with normal commits on the Action-managed branch. We have not shortened approved requirements, rewritten their original identity, started a rerun loop or used a replacement branch.
Expected: generate a bounded schema-valid scope result that preserves the original requirement identities, or provide actionable measured facts for the offending output. Please resolve the generator/normalization contract in Copilot without requiring consumer acceptance or scope to be weakened.
efraespada commentedon Nov 1, 2026
Another exact-head occurrence on consumer Domus PR15, source
7e80b1aa7ccc42a233f69c010d9dfa29323bfd4e.vypdev/copilot@v3resolved to3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0.572c192b-9567-4d9e-a87f-6deafb666d6f.scope, reasonscope-clause-limit, field$.lines, requirementnone, original issue lineL93.The previous head5415908 completed Commit and Verification successfully against the same unchanged original issue contract. The current increment only adds test/fixture counterevidence and documentation for the unrelated semantic Bugbot finding reported in#847; runtime and immutable Edge.4 build source are unchanged. The new scope failure points to L93 rather than the previous L111 occurrence. No raw generated clause count or numeric limit is supplied, so neither is inferred here.
Existing progress labels/assessments were retained as the failure contract promises. Complete new-head project CI and Bugbot state are independent of this progress-generation failure. We continue implementation and preserve the owner requirement for complete product tests/coverage and no unresolved findings before merge. Copilot resources, limits, configuration, credentials and original issue acceptance have not been modified. Please own the upstream fix; no automatic rerun loop or weakened contract was introduced.
Follow-up at
ecdd85b4b08479eede41a517f9acdfdde9393b17: the same failure recurs in Commit and Verification, with phasescope, reasonscope-clause-limit, field$.lines, requirementnone, original issue lineL103, reference7cd0c149-da09-437a-9390-304e3e91d85a. Original L103 from the unchanged issue snapshot:This follow-up commit only explicitly closes a SQLite connection owned by a regression test; production/runtime/image source and the original issue contract remain unchanged. Full new-head CI is still separate. The semantic UI finding from#847 has meanwhile been natively resolved by vypbot as obsolete; this progress-generation failure is unrelated to that resolution. No limits, acceptance or Copilot files were changed.
Follow-up at
6e05ba740af6c03cfff3509e0f687bac2a9f06f5: Commit job124925047062 and Verification124925466923 reject progress with phasescope, reasonscope-clause-limit, field$.lines, requirementnone, original issue lineL97, reference502f14a8-76d0-4e45-8aae-0bd7c73d4a4b. Existing progress is retained. No generated clause count/limit is supplied, so none is inferred. The independent project CI Check124926099504 succeeds, including actual Edge.5 images on both CPU families with19cases each. Native product findings are handled separately; the current documentation-version finding is being corrected. Copilot/source contract/credentials/gateway remain untouched; no retry loop or contract relaxation is used.efraespada commentedon Nov 1, 2026
Another observed scope-contract rejection on a new consumer issue, Domus #17, ready PR #19, head
930c2fc1f68e715f2c4ed39a2511fab1ae7fb235.This is reported against the same published immutable Action revision as the earlier observations. #828 is currently closed. I have not verified that a later fix is present in this published v3 artifact, and do not claim a regression on an unobserved newer revision. Please confirm the supported upstream recovery/publication or reopen/consolidate as appropriate.
ef49c3c093e9fce1fdc820dd945ab2c1da94b79e->930c2fc1f68e715f2c4ed39a2511fab1ae7fb235.vypdev/copilot@v3to3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0, runtime codex-cli0.166.0.scope, reasonscope-clause-limit, field$.lines, requirementnone, original issue sourceL162.869f6f2e-5a73-4cdd-a78c-546d140d4d47; retryable Yes. Existing progress/assessments are retained and no valid new progress is published.The current original issue body was independently read. L162 is the human-reviewed prospective companion's state-table row:
This identifies the text present at inspection; the exact job-time body snapshot and rejected generated clause array are not available in the inspected diagnostics. Actual emitted clause count, configured bound and causal normalization behavior are therefore unknown. Unlike the initial issue description, this current anchor is a substantive human-supplied table row, not evidence of generated recommendation JSON inclusion.
Independent exact-head CI Check succeeds, including both real CPU image gates. The new local temporal checkpoint passes3081 backend executions/110 authored modules at100% statement and branch coverage, with a source-complete audit. That does not establish accepted progress output or shipping the new temporal modules in the existing immutable image. The PR remains an incomplete implementation and is not being merged. Separate partial human-conversation Bugbot coverage is reported in#843 and is not this scope failure.
No Copilot source, generated resource, credential, configuration, model, contract bound, consumer requirement or gateway was changed. No manual rerun loop was started. Please retain fail-closed output validation and prior progress while addressing generation/normalization or providing a source-preserving recovery; do not require truncating legitimate scope merely to obtain a green check.
efraespada commentedon Nov 1, 2026
Exact-head follow-up on the same published progress-contract failure: Domus PR19, source
64908ee59705e6e9dc6e4a06a8d828bf5eea6d4f.Commit41346617406/job124967695376 and Verification124968110280 fail with phase scope, reason scope-clause-limit, field $.lines, requirement none, original issue line L173, reference
bbc1ef0d-c919-444b-a9a9-6cf785935111. Existing progress is retained; generated clause count, bound and rejected output remain unavailable and are not inferred. The original issue body observed at inspection has L173: | Week start | Enum | MO | MO, TU, WE, TH, FR, SA, SU | Fixed rule, separate from display preference |.Independent exact-head CI and3260 backend tests/116 modules at100% pass. Current source was subsequently synchronized through the Action to580ab11; its new full CI and3398-test combined backend pass separately. These observations do not certify that the earlier rejected progress output became valid or that a newer upstream fix was deployed. The explicit new-head review's conversation limitation remains#843. No Copilot source/configuration/credentials, approved scope or bound changed; no manual retry loop was introduced.
efraespada commentedon Nov 2, 2026
Additional occurrence on a new consumer issue and unchanged released runtime; reuse #828 rather than create a duplicate.
No Copilot code/resources/workflows/configuration/credentials/bounds were changed, no issue scope or case inventory was reduced, and no healthy queued/running job was restarted. The owner has a standing waiver for reported Copilot-only progress failures; product checks and zero Bugbot findings remain required. Application work continues. Please preserve fail-closed scope validation and original progress while making this accepted coherent scope assessable through the supported flow.
efraespada commentedon Nov 2, 2026
A further exact-head occurrence on Domus issue #25 / ready PR #26, on the same published immutable Action revision already discussed here. This report does not assert that a later upstream fix is deployed or regressed.
2b6e7e18ac246b62aa70cfcee69d0c8aaed34231; push predecessor:b14c308a28ecad52945a8edac6dce25ba9dfd655; comparison base:6d84d4815a8bbfe071979df6650d01e433dcc2db.vypdev/copilot@v3to3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0and admits codex-cli 0.166.0. The completed scope result is rejected withscope-clause-limit, field$.lines, requirementnone, original issue sourceL120; reference582fc0c3-6bbc-4b4e-94aa-b1f556f00b41. Existing progress remains; the check failsagent.failed.| HADW-03 | Translate bounded verified HA presentation/directory facts, keeping denied, unavailable and confirmed absence distinct. |. This is the source observed at inspection, not an independently retained job-time snapshot. The generated clause array and actual count/bound are not exposed, so no deterministic cause or count is inferred.completed. The valid OpenAPI integer maximum was fixed; the missing-guide false positive is separately evidenced in 🐛 - Bugbot reports an unchanged tracked migration guide as missing at the reviewed head #861. These two dispositions are not two false positives, and successful review does not imply successful progress publication.On the user's instruction to merge eligible green PRs, one bounded retry of the terminal failed job has now started as job 125431165145 in the same run. No running/queued job was restarted and no retry loop was introduced. Its result is pending at publication. GitHub connector writes are unavailable (403), so the existing authorized maintainer CLI session launched the native rerun.
No Copilot source, installed resources, configuration, workflow, credentials, model or contract bounds were changed. Domus requirements and all retained owner cases remain intact; the unfinished workspace is not claimed accepted. Please consolidate or reopen upstream as appropriate, retain fail-closed validation and prior progress, and provide source-preserving supported recovery or publication. No consumer scope reduction or validation bypass is requested.
Retry outcome: the single native retry completed with the same rejection class on the same published Action SHA. Retry job 125431165145 rejects phase scope / scope-clause-limit / $.lines / requirement none / source L340, reference
8ea5b7e0-e953-4696-8fee-31efd2a100e4. The current Verification check 125432264577 remains failure. No actual clause count/bound or job-time issue snapshot is inferred from that anchor. Previous progress remains; no second manual retry is planned.The latest owner request specifically requires green checks for merge. PR26 therefore remains open despite green product CI, 100% coverage and no unresolved native code findings. No rule or check bypass was applied. Existing uncommitted next-increment work was preserved separately; the reviewed head did not move.
Subsequent source increment (separate from the unchanged-head retry above): Domus PR26 advanced normally to
db26dde72985b57ad1377be83c554e449a5c4f8ewith the bounded HA name/directory/roster implementation. The same published Action SHA rejects progress again: Commit job 125434780323, Verification 125435756351, phase scope / scope-clause-limit / $.lines / requirement none / source L122, referenceb55a9231-6c0c-4b1a-9c81-65a9bcd046f5. No additional manual retry is started.Independent current-head product CI 41491340060 and aggregate 125438651537 pass, including actual amd64 job 125434820061 and aarch64 job 125434820085. Local matching source evidence is 4,354 backend executions / 151 authored modules / 10,432 statements / 2,928 branches at 100% globally and per module. Native review 41491340121/job125434822120 completes 8/8 partitions with complete context, zero candidate/published/open/reopened/verification-required findings and outcome no-findings (fixed 1/dismissed 1 remain historical). The original owner scope remains unfinished; complete workspace acceptance is not claimed. Copilot resources/configuration/credentials and all contract bounds remain unchanged; application work continues without waiting for an upstream fix.
Browser-journal increment, separate from the previous observations: PR26 advanced normally to
59c134a6585a3866f9d61143fb2d2b3abda12fb6. Commit job 125445431582 and Verification 125446427999 fail with the same scope-clause-limit class, field $.lines, requirement none, source L123, reference2d5ab105-e8b7-4a0d-9560-387f43f8d5d1. The Action pin remains 3e7ceea. Previous progress is retained; no clause count, deterministic cause or newer-fix regression is inferred. No manual rerun was started.Local frontend validation at that head passes 765 Chromium executions / 21 authored runtime files at 100% lines, statements, functions and branches, with independent audit; the unchanged backend source retains matching 151-module evidence. Native review 41494411170/job125445465782 completes 9/9 partitions with complete context and publishes one valid medium SDD acceptance-budget finding. It is being corrected in c357ce4920ee54ca01a14b3a11774587fe885159 by decomposing the unchanged eight requirements into 80 independently observable scenarios with explicit rationale and reciprocal links, while preserving original HADM 72/HADI 8 owner scope. This valid consumer finding is not a Copilot defect and is not waived; fresh review must verify the correction before merge. The independent product CI and fresh document-head CI are separate gates. No Copilot resource/configuration/credential/bound or consumer product policy changed.
Documentation correction head
c357ce4920ee54ca01a14b3a11774587fe885159has the same published scope rejection: Commit job 125452688318, Verification 125454731771, phase scope / scope-clause-limit / $.lines / requirement none / source L121, reference22c4a5e1-d372-4a29-888d-afb0662850a5, same Action SHA. No manual retry or contract change is made.The valid consumer SDD finding is independently confirmed fixed by native review 41496499460/job125452728775: complete context, all 9/9 partitions, open 0/reopened 0/verification-required 0, fixed 2/dismissed 1, outcome completed. Both fixed findings are valid corrections (OpenAPI maximum and acceptance-budget decomposition); only the missing-guide claim was a proved false positive. Source runtime/coverage remains byte-identical; current product CI has backend/frontend/architecture/types/docs/tooling green and both actual CPU image jobs still running at this observation. No complete product/workspace acceptance is inferred, and the unrelated progress result remains rejected. Application work continues with all retained scope and fail-closed checks intact.
HTTP/exact-entry increment, observed separately: Domus ready PR26 advanced normally to
7be2810092021aa044f0c476d429f689b9113d61fromc357ce4920ee54ca01a14b3a11774587fe885159. The same released immutable Action pin rejects progress: Commit run41505789652/job125484664034, Verification125485676433. Original logs resolve vypdev/copilot@v3 to3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0 and admit codex-cli0.166.0; they reject phase scope / scope-clause-limit / $.lines / requirement none / source L123, reference3e605ca0-5f3d-41df-a39d-7c1849aaca0e. Previous progress is retained. The independently inspected current issue25 row at L123 is HADW-06 (accessible responsive EN/ES administration and both deployment/browser journeys); this is not a retained job-time snapshot. No generated clause count/bound or deterministic cause is available, and no regression of an unobserved newer upstream fix is asserted.Matching local source passes4,358backend executions across151authored modules (10,433statements/2,928branches,100%globally/per-module) and897Chromium frontend executions across26authored runtime files (all four supported metrics100%, independently audited),51actual packaged-entry/Python/SQLite journeys and18Storybook journeys. The exact current wheel and all module/UI bytes are verified. Current hosted CI41505801643 already has frontend,toolchain,architecture,types and documentation green; backend and both actual CPU images are still in progress at this observation. Native review41505801599 is also in progress and must independently review this new source. The preceding c357 checkpoint later completed all product jobs including both CPU images successfully. These observations do not substitute for fresh review/images or full retained administration/workspace acceptance.
No manual retry, check bypass, scope reduction or change to Copilot code/resources/workflows/configuration/credentials/models/bounds is made. The complete HADM72/HADI8/HADW80 requirements remain. Under the owner's latest all-green merge condition PR26 remains open; product/controller work continues. Please reopen/consolidate the upstream report as appropriate and preserve strict validation/prior progress while providing supported source-preserving publication recovery.
Current UI-binding correction checkpoint
53570f20bd8c89cd2940b5b8d5187eb8ed962428repeats the same progress rejection: Commit41507261957/job125489636778, Verification125491236020, scope-clause-limit / $.lines / requirement none / source L121, referenceb9e518a3-5fe9-481a-89fb-58b2c3f0b99b. Original logs again resolve the unchanged v3 Action to3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0 with codex-cli0.166.0. Existing progress remains; no manual retry or inferred clause count/root cause/newer-fix regression is claimed.Independent product CI41507276305/aggregate125492943440 now passes every applicable job, including actual amd64 image125489680572 and aarch64 image125489680631. The preceding aarch64 failure was a valid Domus test/evidence mismatch (historical Edge.5 resource hashes selected for a new compiled bundle); the current-source declaration and early wheel comparison fix that consumer issue without changing historical owner evidence. It is not a Copilot defect or waived check. Runtime bytes retain matching4,358backend/151module and897frontend/26file complete-coverage evidence.
Fresh native review41507276321/job125489680430 completes all11/11partitions with complete context, candidate/published/open/reopened/verification-required0, fixed2/dismissed1 historical and outcome no-findings. Successful review and product CI remain separate from the rejected progress assessment. No Copilot resource/configuration/credential/contract-bound or owner scope is modified. PR26 remains open under the latest all-green merge condition; controller/full-workspace implementation continues on its existing Action-managed branch. No complete product acceptance is inferred.
Two subsequent observations on the same released Action pin, kept separate from consumer correctness:
f491b572cea14e21a0fbfc8c664b110335a54f0e: Commit41511047275/job125502656863, Verification125503666676, scope-clause-limit / $.lines / requirement none / source L121, reference3316655a-18be-4476-b313-8d8d1eb00882.b60b7677c07faf62c534943c09748b70ad4a6408: Commit41516123502/job125520014056, Verification125520991579, same rejection class / $.lines / requirement none / source L123, reference8236ca2c-832f-4491-8785-05b1bd1a0808.Both original logs explicitly resolve vypdev/copilot@v3 to3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0 and admit codex-cli0.166.0. Existing progress remains; no generated clause count/bound, job-time issue snapshot or deterministic cause is inferred. No unseen newer-fix regression, manual retry or acceptance bypass is asserted.
The f491 native review completed12/12partitions with complete context and one valid low household-receipt binding finding. This was a real Domus gap, not a Copilot defect: a null current aggregate fact let a mismatched household receipt through. The b60 correction adds independently verified capability-v2 household routing scope and preserves valid original GET recovery without aggregate-read permission. It also preserves the existing both-deployment read-only lease GET contract while mutations remain blocked. Journal1, command payloads, original HADM72/HADI8 and all80existing workspace rows remain unchanged; two independent verification scenarios are added. Source/SDK contract bounds are not relaxed.
Fresh b60 native review41516134181/job125520053158 completes all13/13partitions with complete context, candidate/published/open/reopened/verification-required0, fixed3/dismissed1 historical and outcome completed. All valid findings were confirmed fixed by native review; none was manually resolved. Matching local b60 evidence is1,020Chromium frontend executions/all28runtime files at100% across all four metrics, independently audited; complete4,360backend executions/151modules/10,434statements/2,928branches at100% globally/per-module plus4separate focused outage-GET executions with identical production bytes. Source/wheel/UI and both actual OpenAPI contracts are verified. Current product CI41516134220 is still completing image/backend/tooling jobs at this observation; prior535 product CI/images passed. No full workspace, owner HA or Stable/all-domain acceptance is inferred.
The progress assessment remains independently rejected despite confirmed code-review corrections. No Copilot code/resources/workflows/configuration/credentials/model/bounds are changed. Under the latest all-green owner condition the PR remains open. Browser workspace work continues. Please reopen/consolidate this report as appropriate and preserve strict validation and existing progress while supplying supported source-preserving publication recovery.
Later terminal observation for exact b60b7677c07faf62c534943c09748b70ad4a6408: all 10 product CI jobs now pass in CI41516134220/aggregate125523343391, including actual amd64 job125520052310 and aarch64 job125520052083 (32 container checks each). Original backend job125520052118 logs 4,364 passed with 10,434 statements/2,928 branches at100%; frontend job125520052099 logs 1,020 unit executions, actual51entry/18catalog journeys and wheel acceptance. The current native13/13review remains complete with zero open findings and the valid correction confirmed fixed. These are now terminal hosted results, distinct from the earlier in-progress observation. Progress publication125520991579 remains rejected independently; no Copilot change, retry, product waiver or full workspace/product acceptance is inferred.
efraespada commentedon Nov 2, 2026
Current-head reproduction on ready Domus PR #28: vypdev/domus#28, head a72103968dd785252ea5f9cf19e81463c0f44085, actual develop base8b1cbc110c389b9cdb6ecd11317c95abf2c4b0a9. The independently admitted feature is issue27; its supported companion recovery has now natively published and its branch is verified. That separate SDD size recovery is recorded in763.
The commit progress check fails in run41532429491/job125575756536, with Verification check125577538412. Original log resolves vypdev/copilot@v3 to3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0 and observes codex-cli0.166.0. Progress metadata at21:56:19.3207507Z pins the exact develop/head pair above. Analysis is admitted21:56:20.0476055Z, completes21:56:34.5618069Z, and is rejected21:56:34.5829270Z:
Progress scope result was rejected (scope-clause-limit; field $.lines; requirement none; source L151). Existing progress was retained.
Terminal error21:57:02.9759509Z: agent.failed; phase scope; reason scope-clause-limit; field $.lines; requirement none; original issue line L151. Reference3aa708a5-d201-4057-b009-babb030611ac. The log provides no measured clause count and no verified requirement identity. We do not infer rejected text, which SDD requirement it means, or a root cause.
Current product CI41532971690 is independently SUCCESS: aggregate125580976776; frontend125577616312, backend125577616501, actual aarch64 image125577616509, actual amd64 image125577616528 and all other required product suites pass. Local full campaign also passes1090 frontend executions/all29runtime files/allfour metrics100%,4364 backend tests/all151modules supported statements/branches100% with independent audits,51real entry/PythonSQLite journeys,18entry-catalog journeys and current wheel-byte acceptance.
The PR-native review is a separate run41532971541 and is not yet claimed clean or complete. Push/branch telemetry with0changedFiles is not presented as review coverage of the actual PR. This checkpoint is intentionally still under implementation: document runtime wiring, full accessible EN/ES forms, actual administration journeys, required human UX and retained owning-case acceptance remain outstanding. Green product tests do not complete that feature.
No manual rerun, model/bound/SDK/configuration/workflow/credential change, disabled check or fabricated progress is used. Native progress labels/assessments remain retained as reported. We continue the actual UI work on this same admitted ref. Please add this exact complete-companion/current-head input to828's existing scope-capacity regression evidence without weakening validation.
efraespada commentedon Nov 2, 2026
Additional current-head reproduction of the same progress scope-capacity rejection, without any Copilot change.
Domus ready PR #28: vypdev/domus#28, current published head185caef9cba900c86fa402f60c4c5e235208ab64, develop base8b1cbc110c389b9cdb6ecd11317c95abf2c4b0a9. This normal follow-up fixes independently reproduced current-member/private-view integration regressions; it does not enlarge or change the native SDD, its original owner inventory, or the existing issue27 body.
Commit progress run41537666041/job125593544133: https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41537666041/job/125593544133. The log resolves vypdev/copilot@v3 to3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0 and admits codex-cli0.166.0 at22:31:01.6658229Z. At22:31:15.1304446Z it rejects: Progress scope result was rejected (scope-clause-limit; field $.lines; requirement none; source L150). Existing progress was retained. Terminal error at22:31:21.0297605Z is agent.failed; phase scope, same reason/field/requirement/original line. Referenceed1c6c8a-4244-4752-8eef-19c5d0947f01. This differs from the previous sourceL151/reference3aa708a5-d201-4057-b009-babb030611ac observation. No measured clause count or candidate text is emitted; neither rejected content nor a root cause is inferred.
The independently scoped PR review is successful: run41537674919/job125593575019, telemetry at22:32:30.4855120Z binds this exact head, complete context,12changedfiles, all3/3partitions,0candidate/0published findings and all finding-state counters0, outcome no-findings. This is the actual PR event, not zero-file push telemetry. Product CI41537674620 was separately in progress at the latest observed snapshot; no final result is inferred. Published source passes1108Chromium frontend executions/all29authoredruntimefiles/all4metrics100% with independent inventory audit and strict types. Unpublished next runtime work has its own separate tests and is not evidence for the published head.
Please retain this exact repeat in828's regression evidence. No retry, model/configuration/credential/workflow/resource/SDK/bound change or weakened product acceptance is used. The native progress state remains as reported. We continue complete document runtime/forms on the same admitted Action-managed branch; the entire workspace and owner HA adoption are not claimed complete.
efraespada commentedon Nov 2, 2026
Third published-head repeat for the existing progress scope-capacity investigation828; no Copilot file/resource/configuration/bound/model/workflow/credential change.
Domus ready PR28 vypdev/domus#28, published headdfb488acf984b4ec3ab76df36007b8bd0f19be5c, exact develop baseline8b1cbc110c389b9cdb6ecd11317c95abf2c4b0a9. This follow-up composes the admitted administration controller into the actual document runtime; issue27/native companion and all original owners/cases are retained.
Copilot Commit run41539755883/job125600604587 https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41539755883/job/125600604587 resolves Action3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0 and admits codex-cli0.166.0 at22:45:50.6164646Z. At22:46:06.5051116Z: Progress scope result was rejected (scope-clause-limit; field $.lines; requirement none; source L240). Existing progress was retained. Terminal22:46:11.9693726Z agent.failed, phase scope, same reason/field/no requirement identity/original line. Reference77635ac9-bf5e-4b50-89ae-0abd3d0adbbe. Corresponding Verification check125601504459 fails. No emitted candidate text or measured clause count; no rejected contents or root cause inferred.
The independent actual PR review is successful: run41539766059/job125600639709 https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41539766059/job/125600639709. Exact-head telemetry at22:45:38.2118763Z reports complete context,16files, all4/4partitions,0candidate/0published findings and every finding-state counter0, outcome no-findings. This is distinct from progress and zero-file push telemetry.
Product CI41539765726 is separately FAILURE, not excused as Copilot-only: frontend job125600638142 reproduced a Chromium CDP response.json body-unavailable error in one new actual administration-read assertion;52other entry cases passed. Backend125600638028, actual amd64125600637895, actual aarch64125600637957 and remaining product suites pass. Original frontend artifact13187040747, namefrontend-application-523a050e8395d4cb5b52d5a628fc39b78d09d648, retains original trace/screenshot. We are fixing the consumer test to retain and forward the actual protected upstream bytes before CDP retires them, as already used for other original responses; no production bypass or blind rerun. The unpublished current fix/own-alias work has its own4374backend/1129frontend100%-coverage and55actualbrowser observations, which are not presented as proof for published dfb.
Please add this exact current-input repeat to828's regression inventory. No acceptance threshold is lowered and no merge is attempted with the product CI failure. Full administration forms, all retained acceptance and owner HA adoption remain pending on the same Action-managed issue27 ref.
efraespada commentedon Nov 2, 2026
Another exact-input repeat of the existing progress scope rejection on Domus PR #28, published head 86e120ac3254a7b4b91d3d4b817f5234a0916f51. No Copilot code, resources, configuration, credentials, workflow, model or bound was changed.
Copilot Commit run 41542902645/job 125611219506 (https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41542902645/job/125611219506), with failed Verification check 125613672299, resolves Action 3e7ceea. codex-cli 0.166.0 is admitted at 2026-11-02T23:12:29.1171239Z. At 23:12:43.9084644Z: Progress scope result was rejected (scope-clause-limit; field $.lines; requirement none; source L237). Existing progress was retained. Terminal 23:12:48.7529940Z: agent.failed, phase scope, same reason/field/no requirement identity/original line. Reference dcaed4a3-08b1-44dd-b857-4b5a4be4347f. Candidate text and measured clause count are not emitted; no root cause or rejected content is inferred.
Independent current-head product CI 41542910536 is now completed SUCCESS, aggregate 125614198484. Frontend 125611245412, backend 125611245269, actual amd64 125611245310, actual aarch64 125611245486 and every other applicable job pass. The prior consumer CDP body-capture failure was corrected by retaining and forwarding real protected upstream bytes; original local/hosted failures and traces remain separate evidence.
The independent current-head PR review also passes: run 41542910578/job 125611246481, complete context, all 5/5 partitions, zero candidate/published/open/reopened/verification-required findings, outcome no-findings. Current source has 4,374 backend tests/all151modules and 1,129 frontend executions/all29runtimefiles at full supported coverage, independent inventories, 55 actual compiled-browser/PythonSQLite and 18 existing-entry catalog cases plus wheel acceptance. New unpublished form-controls work is not evidence for this published head.
Please retain this reference in #828's regression inventory. No rerun, relaxed validation or fabricated progress is used. The complete visible administration forms and retained acceptance remain in progress on the same admitted Action-managed ref; no full workspace/owner-HA acceptance or automatic merge is inferred.
efraespada commentedon Nov 3, 2026
A further independently identified recurrence on Domus PR #28. This updates the existing report rather than opening a duplicate.
Source and execution
3da7e98a32c5c6ca7d2a9ba2348cfd2b05a3bdb7.vypdev/copilot@v3, resolved SHA3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0.scope-clause-limit; field $.lines; requirement none; source L140.agent.failedat 08:38:45.0170325Z; reference0c02fe42-908d-49b2-8c0b-fd5b99203305.Observed contract failure
The job reports that the returned progress result violated its contract, so progress was not published. The current result says phase scope, field $.lines, requirement none and original issue line L140. It explicitly preserves existing progress labels/assessments and marks the failure retryable. No generated scope text, candidate clause count or verified requirement identity is exposed here; we cannot responsibly infer the offending sentence or a deeper root cause from L140 alone.
Independent review result
The actual PR review completed successfully at the same head:
https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41604593997/job/125811180905
Its final native telemetry has complete context, 8/8 analysis partitions, zero candidate/published findings, all finding-state counts zero and outcome no-findings. The push-side review was skipped for pull_request_ownership; that is separate from the actual completed PR review and the failed progress publication.
Separate consumer verification
Current frontend application and backend CI jobs pass. The Python tooling job independently and correctly found that our new administration Storybook file was not explicitly registered in the consumer's tested catalog inventory (147 passed, one failed). That consumer issue is reproduced locally and fixed by adding only that exact already-tested story path; all 148 tooling tests and supported statement/branch coverage then pass. We are not attributing the consumer inventory failure to Copilot, and no current CPU-image result is inferred while those jobs are still running.
Requested upstream handling
Please preserve and diagnose this new reference alongside the earlier occurrences, keep progress generation inside the unchanged scope contract, and provide bounded/redacted diagnostics that distinguish an unavailable requirement identity from a verified requirement/source mapping. The available evidence supports a recurring progress scope rejection; it does not establish an upstream fix or justify relaxing the contract.
No Copilot code, resources, configuration, workflows, model/provider settings, credentials, acceptance limits or gateway code were changed. Product work continues on the same Action-managed issue/ref. Original workflow logs, final native telemetry and the distinct consumer failure/passing measurements are retained locally.
efraespada commentedon Nov 3, 2026
A new exact-head recurrence after the consumer-only catalog-registration correction, separate from the previous comment's reference.
e7d090ba6bc4a0968b6813eef80d78575bcb424aon feat: Add verified household administration workspace (#27) domus#28. The follow-up changes only the explicit tested Storybook registration, its SDD impact declaration and verification record; application/backend/UI bytes are unchanged from3da7e98.vypdev/copilot@v3resolves to3e7ceea08e6131360e026937d1c0cc1b120472e0; Codex CLI 0.166.0 admitted at 2026-11-03T08:47:19.4890591Z.scope-clause-limit; field $.lines; requirement none; source L136.agent.failedat 08:47:49.6700163Z; referenceab910578-f5a8-4774-8ae8-d25351f0a3b0. The separate failed Verification check is https://github.com/vypdev/domus/runs/125815650944Independent current-source results are now complete:
This was a normal source update, not a blind rerun, model change or contract workaround. No Copilot source/resources/configuration/workflows/provider settings/credentials/limits were modified. The completed code review and product CI do not fix the separate progress-publication error. Product acceptance work continues on the same issue/ref. Please retain this new reference and the original diagnostics under the existing scope-contract investigation, without inferring unseen candidate details or relaxing the contract.
Additional exact-head recurrence: b9a2dfc
Additional exact-head recurrence:87d726f
Head87d726fa5a6a8cbcb56e0b911d15cc5b8a96a470 normally clarifies equivalent enabled/disabled test expectations and records the independently verified false positive. Application and wheel bytes match b9a2dfc; no Copilot setting or bound changes.
Commit workflow https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41612724403/job/125838409950 ; failed Verification https://github.com/vypdev/domus/runs/125839351513 . Codex CLI0.166.0 was admitted2026-11-03T09:40:31.3369749Z. At09:40:55.8800311Z scope was rejected: scope-clause-limit;$.lines;requirement none;source L175. Terminal agent.failed at09:41:01.9965910Z, reference6caa54f0-8917-40ad-b41c-0b17aff73438. Existing progress is retained and retryable Yes. Candidate scope text/count and verified requirement identity remain unavailable; no internal cause or specific offending sentence is inferred.
Independent native PR review https://github.com/vypdev/domus/actions/runs/41612731923/job/125838437612 completes full context and8/8partitions: zero candidate/published/open/reopened/verification-required/unknown findings; historical fixed1. The prior matcher finding was resolved automatically after an equivalent readability refactor, not manually dismissed. Its original false API premise remains reported under#867. Current frontend CI125838436460 passes; no remaining backend/image conclusion is inferred from their last in-progress snapshot. This code-review result is separate from the continuing progress-contract failure. Original logs/telemetry remain retained locally.
Domus e32aa07 recurrence
The unchanged progress-publication contract fails again for Domus head
e32aa071666990e1fed86e9d67be7bb264eb3287(PR28). This consumer increment fixes reproduced read-only keyboard focus loss and adds real high-int64/independent-writer SQLite journeys. Local1,231Chromium tests have100% all4coverage metrics;81compiled Python/SQLite cases and26catalog cases pass. This evidence does not assert full186-case feature acceptance.2026-11-03T10:26:20.4291402Z.scope-clause-limit; field $.lines; requirement none; source L151.96be58f7-c5df-40a1-a558-0481d90d3777.Current CI41619030884/job125863019799 now passes every applicable product job and both actual CPU images. Native review41619031038/job125859692675 completes all8/8partitions with complete context, zero candidate/published/open/reopened/verification-required/unknown findings, historicalfixed1. These independent results apply to exacte32aa07; the progress-contract failure remains. Full private job diagnostics are retained locally; only bounded non-secret operational references are published here. Please investigate in Copilot.
Domus6e8c221scope recurrence
Exact head
6e8c22135c019829f62e1ec28872783dc446be75; existing PR28/issue27. Push run41628830069/job125892888416. At2026-11-03T11:37:42.1380678Z: scope-clause-limit, field $.lines, requirement none, sourceL124; referencea138d72b-51ac-40a3-9115-57bc8edd860d. Existing progress retained, RetryableYes. Candidate clause count and verified requirement identity are not exposed; no root cause or source mapping is inferred.This change adds actual image-hosted browser verification without changing production runtime. Local aarch64 image has10passing form journeys and byte-matches151Python/4UIresources;87normal journeys and162tooling tests/full supported coverage pass. Current CI41628838888 is independently in progress. Current native9/9review has one separately disproven Python3.14 syntax premise reported in #831; do not mistake that open finding or its equivalent readability change for product acceptance. No Copilot code/resources/workflows/configuration/models/credentials/limits, acceptance or coverage relaxation; no blind retry.
Domus6c1a0d2scope recurrence
Exacthead
6c1a0d2032cef328dc6e58dd2661232f1fbd364d; pushrun41630460442/job125898391557. At2026-11-03T11:49:57.3208935Z: scope-clause-limit, field $.lines, requirement none, sourceL140, reference965ced5c-187f-47bc-a601-4d656cb8aeec. Existingprogress retained; RetryableYes. No candidate/source mapping or root cause is exposed/inferred; no blind retry or contract relaxation.Change: equivalent named exception tuple after the Python3.14 false premise reported in #831. Current native41630471059/job125898428229 has complete context,9/9partitions,0candidate/published/open/reopened/verification-required/unknown, historicalfixed2; original thread is automatically resolved. Previous6e8 product CI41628838888/job125896927711 passes both actual CPU images and10actual-image browser journeys on each. Fresh6c1CI41630471010/job125903019805 now passes all applicable product groups and both actual CPU images, each with32container checks plus10real image-hosted Chromium form journeys. Frontend1231/backend4374/tooling162 tests retain full supported coverage;87source-composed/26catalog journeys pass. This is independent exact-head evidence, not progress-publication success. No Copilot edits/model/credential/bound changes.