[Brooooooklyn]

Follow-up to #606.

Problem

With advancedOptimizations, #606 removes an @Inject(TOKEN) import only when every value use of TOKEN sits inside a decorator that compilation removes. To decide that, it matched the decorator's local name, so @I(TOKEN) for import { Inject as I } didn't count. The compiler does remove it, and the factory uses i1.TOKEN. A file with both shapes therefore kept an import that nothing uses:

import { Inject as I } from "@angular/core";
import { TOKEN } from "./tokens";   // kept, but never used in the output
@Injectable() export class A { constructor(@I(TOKEN) v: unknown) {} }
@Injectable() export class B { constructor(@Inject(TOKEN) v: unknown) {} }

Main removed it; #606 kept it.

Fix

Decide by what the decorator resolves to (angular_param_decorator, which follows aliases and ng.Inject), not by its local name.

Checks

• New test test_aliased_inject_counts_as_removed. cargo test --workspace: 3415 passed.
• The output for the case above imports i1 from ./tokens and no named TOKEN, like main.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[Brooooooklyn]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-23T10:24:25.610389Z	ed0bde2	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish!

Reviewed commit: ed0bde2ef5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".