Skip to content

feat(memory): backfill original text search index - #284

Open
jack-arturo wants to merge 3 commits into
feat/original-text-storagefrom
feat/original-text-backfill
Open

jack-arturo wants to merge 3 commits into
feat/original-text-storagefrom
feat/original-text-backfill

Conversation

@jack-arturo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Add a resumable, dry-run-by-default backfill for the original-text index introduced in #283. It uses guarded updates and verifies coverage without changing content, metadata, or vectors.

Legacy original metadata may be stale after edits. The default indexes current content; using older preserved originals requires the explicit --assume-legacy-original-current assumption. Some historical batch originals were never preserved and cannot be reconstructed.

Validation

  • 17 backfill tests passed, including the disposable FalkorDB integration test.
  • Isolated 548-record trial: dry-run wrote nothing; safe apply indexed current content; explicit trust upgraded 542 preserved originals; repeat applied zero writes with no conflicts.
  • Local pre-PR review found no actionable issues.

Breaking changes: none intended. Stacked on #283; merge that dependency first.

Implementation harness: Codex desktop.

@jack-arturo jack-arturo added the babysit:waiting-codex Babysit waiting-codex status label Nov 11, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-11T01:08:37.098434Z 255212c PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@jack-arturo jack-arturo added babysit:ready Babysit ready status and removed babysit:waiting-codex Babysit waiting-codex status labels Nov 11, 2026

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

babysit:ready Babysit ready status

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant