You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Write run 4's seal: three arms, both legs, both the green and the red branch #500
A sealed prediction document, written before the first dispatch of run 4 and stored off the tracker,
the way run 3's was (~/Desktop/run3-sealed-predictions-2026-09-16.md). Scored afterwards by someone who
did not run it, against the diff, the posted threads and the node artefacts — never against a leg's own
report.
Three arms, decided while charting:
Per fix, does the symptom leave the bench? Six precondition tickets, six rows: for each, predict
whether its symptom is still observable in run 4. A fix that changes nothing observable was fixing
prose.
Which claims are still not derived? Read against the list this ticket is blocked by. #487 and #488 are the candidates, because both are
satisfied by "read another file", which is easy to satisfy halfway.
What turns up that nobody predicted. Run 3's arm 2 was incomplete and its real finding — User2.tsx inventing its own glyph — was on nobody's list. An open arm, scored as "the seal was
incomplete" if it fills.
Two rules the seal must honour, both broken once already
It is written before the first dispatch and it covers both legs. Run 3's arm 3 was written at 16:30
with /specs already dispatched, and the register marks it a weakened seal for exactly that reason.
It predicts the red branch as well as the green one.#439
criterion 4 makes a red build open no pull request and end the run cancelled. A seal that predicts
only green cannot score the outcome that would teach the most.
Not decided
Whether the per-fix arm predicts a binary (symptom present or absent) or the specific counter value
(reconcile's fixed, still_present, new). The counters are known by construction on a
byte-identical commit, so predicting them is arithmetic rather than prediction — but predicting the
binary loses the case where the counter is right for the wrong reason.
Where the seal is stored, and how the scorer proves it was sealed before dispatch. Run 3 used a file on
the maintainer's machine and a timestamp in the register. Nothing verified it.
Closed as superseded by #678's resolution, approved by the maintainer on 2026-10-30: run 4 is dropped and unic-archon-dlc is frozen. Reason for this ticket: no run, so no seal (rule C).
Activity
orioltf commentedon Oct 30, 2026
Closed as superseded by #678's resolution, approved by the maintainer on 2026-10-30: run 4 is dropped and
unic-archon-dlcis frozen. Reason for this ticket: no run, so no seal (rule C).—
unic-sdlc-orchestrator-9