Repository navigation
Compare our four Boxes against seanrobertwright/archon-pocock-workflow #385
Description
Question
github.com/seanrobertwright/archon-pocock-workflow also ports Matt Pocock's skills into Archon
workflows. It is generic where ours is tailored to Unic. Read it against our four Boxes
(unic-dlc-build, -qa, -pr-review, -explore) and report what to learn.
Two directions, both useful. What it does that ours lacks — a node shape, a gate, a way of reading a
Method. And what ours builds that it gets for free — every such case is a candidate for deletion,
which matters more here than the first direction.
Read the repository as the primary source. Do not infer its design from its README.
Acceptance criteria
- Its workflow set is mapped against our four Boxes, naming what has no counterpart on either
side. - Anything ours over-builds is listed with the file and node, and a verdict on whether it can go.
- Anything worth adopting is listed with the reason it beats what we have.
- The findings are captured as a Markdown file in the repo, per the
/researchMethod.
Activity
orioltf commentedon Aug 14, 2026
How to start this session
Produces: a findings file comparing
archon-pocock-workflowagainst our four Boxes./wayfinder 373 #385. It claims this ticket. Research runs in parallel with other work./researchagainst https://github.com/seanrobertwright/archon-pocock-workflow./researchMethod's convention.Traps
is the cheaper half of this comparison.
differences are deliberate.
orioltf commentedon Nov 3, 2026
Closing: unic-archon-dlc is frozen, and adlc, its successor, does not inherit this work. adlc drops Archon, so the comparison no longer applies.