Back off on DescribeWorkerDeployment ResourceExhausted error#291
Merged
Back off on DescribeWorkerDeployment ResourceExhausted error#291
DescribeWorkerDeployment ResourceExhausted error#291Conversation
DescribeWorkerDeployment ResourceExhausted errorDescribeWorkerDeployment ResourceExhausted error
Collaborator
Author
|
integration test will pass once I pull in #290 |
Shivs11
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2026
jaypipes
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2026
…er into backoff-on-resource-exhausted2
DescribeWorkerDeployment ResourceExhausted errorDescribeWorkerDeployment ResourceExhausted error
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was changed and why
Problem
Namespaces with many TemporalWorkerDeployment objects can trigger Temporal's per-namespace DescribeWorkerDeployment rate limit (frontend.globalNamespaceWorkerDeploymentReadRPS, default 50 RPS). When this happens, the reconciler was returning the error immediately, causing the workqueue to requeue with an exponential backoff starting at ~5ms — effectively a tight retry loop that makes the rate-limit problem worse.
The error comes back as *serviceerror.ResourceExhausted (not a standard gRPC codes.ResourceExhausted status), so it must be detected with errors.As rather than grpcstatus.FromError.
Changes
Checklist
Closes [Bug] Worker Deployment Read API rate limit still exceeded in v1.4.0 #278
How was this tested: