ci: support configurable runners for review and fixes - #80
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Aceiro hard-codes GitHub-hosted runners for every review and fix job, so a caller cannot use its own capacity when GitHub queues a run. On Rito PR #29, the initial review job waited 46 minutes while the same push’s CodeBuild validation started in 23 seconds.
Add an optional
runner-labelsJSON-array input to both reusable workflows and apply it to all 11 jobs, including permission checks and delivery. The default remains["ubuntu-latest"]. Use uv’s Python 3.13 selection and automatic installation instead of Ubuntu-orientedactions/setup-python; the initial author check runs through uv without installing project dependencies. Existing job permissions, approval gates, dependency pins, and disabled caches remain in place.Document CodeBuild labels, per-job compute overrides, isolated-runner requirements, and the remaining ownership and capacity checks before a consumer rollout. This PR enables runner selection; it does not change Rito’s callers or deploy AWS resources.
Validation:
job.workflow_sha/job.workflow_repositoryfields excluded.2.1.220).ARM CodeBuild execution and the cross-owner
ritofactory→svozza/aceiroreusable-workflow routing still need a live smoke test before Rito switches runners.