Move back to using culling states for texture streaming GC. - #6028
Draft
Geenz wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
…m cull vs. occlusion cull. Also move to an offscreen unload bias instead of the frustum allowance - generally makes more sense as a metric I think.
github-actions
Bot
added
c/cpp
cmake
llwindow
llcommon
llimage
llimagej2coj
llinventory
llkdu
llprimitive
llrender
llui
labels
Geenz
marked this pull request as draft
July 21, 2026 09:42
akleshchev
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Moves back to using occlusion culling states for texture garbage collection. Also splits between frustum cull and occlusion cull to better differentiate between the two - this is useful for making off screen garbage collection actually functional without occlusion cull state accidentally stomping on it.