Skip to content

nemo-relay: Add versions 0.9.4, 0.10.0 - #2752

Draft
riseproject-dev[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
github-actions/nightly-upgrade/nemo-relay
Draft

riseproject-dev[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
github-actions/nightly-upgrade/nemo-relay

Conversation

@riseproject-dev

@riseproject-dev riseproject-dev Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automatically generated by the nightly check_versions.py run.

nemo-relay v0.9.3 -> v0.9.4, v0.10.0

Every - version: entry added to docs/packages/nemo-relay.yaml is built by this PR's own build-nemo-relay.yml run; merging publishes the wheels.

@riseproject-dev
riseproject-dev Bot requested a review from luhenry October 6, 2026 08:43
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
PR Preview Action v1.8.1

QR code for preview link

🚀 View preview at
https://riseproject-dev.github.io/python-wheels/pr-preview/pr-2752/

Built to branch gh-pages at 2026-10-10 11:31 UTC.
Preview will be ready when the GitHub Pages deployment is complete.

Signed-off-by: riseproject-dev[bot] <330740410+riseproject-dev[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@riseproject-dev
riseproject-dev Bot force-pushed the github-actions/nightly-upgrade/nemo-relay branch from 3e2b17e to 186c396 Compare October 9, 2026 08:52
@riseproject-dev riseproject-dev Bot changed the title nemo-relay: Add version 0.9.4 nemo-relay: Add versions 0.9.4, 0.10.0 Oct 9, 2026
Nightly version bump omitted the patches/nemo-relay/<version> directory for
0.9.4, 0.10.0, so the build's unconditional `git apply .../*.patch` step
failed with "No such file or directory" before any build/test ran.
Copied forward the same patch set from 0.9.3 (unchanged since then).
Upstream 0.10.0 added a prost.boxed(...) call right after the
protoc_executable(protoc_bin_vendored::protoc_bin_path()?) line in
crates/worker-proto/build.rs, so the carried-forward hunk no longer
matched. The vendored-protoc lookup is still unconditional upstream, so
the riscv64 fallback is still needed; only the context changed.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant