Conversation
Documentation build overview
Show files changed (4 files in total): 📝 4 modified | ➕ 0 added | ➖ 0 deleted
|
Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> Co-authored-by: Donghee Na <donghee.na@python.org> Co-authored-by: devdanzin <74280297+devdanzin@users.noreply.github.com>
d2de5dc to
726ec3c
Compare
Co-authored-by: Jacob Coffee <jacob@z7x.org>
…delines. Add the Guidelines to the contributing table.
savannahostrowski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for doing this, @Mariatta!
My comments are mainly about extending the guidance to cover issues as well. While AI tooling can be great at surfacing real bugs and security issues, I think it's still important that those filing issues understand the problem themselves so we can keep discussions focused and productive.
| If a contributor repeatedly opens unproductive issues or PRs, they may be blocked. | ||
|
|
||
| Sometimes AI assisted tools make failing unit tests pass by altering or bypassing the tests rather than addressing the | ||
| underlying problem in the code. Such changes do not represent a real fix and are not acceptable. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure if this just GitHub rendering but the line break here looks a little funky?
| Considerations for success | ||
| ========================== | ||
|
|
||
| Authors must review the work done by AI tooling in detail to ensure it actually makes sense before proposing it as a PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Authors must review the work done by AI tooling in detail to ensure it actually makes sense before proposing it as a PR. | |
| Authors must review the work done by AI tooling in detail to ensure it actually makes sense before proposing it as a PR or filing it as an issue. |
|
|
||
| Authors must review the work done by AI tooling in detail to ensure it actually makes sense before proposing it as a PR. | ||
|
|
||
| We expect PR authors to be able to explain their proposed changes in their own words. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| We expect PR authors to be able to explain their proposed changes in their own words. | |
| We expect PR authors and those filing issues to be able to explain their proposed changes in their own words. |
| Disclosure of the use of AI tools in the PR description is appreciated, while not required. Be prepared to explain how | ||
| the tool was used and what changes it made. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Disclosure of the use of AI tools in the PR description is appreciated, while not required. Be prepared to explain how | |
| the tool was used and what changes it made. | |
| Disclosure of the use of AI tools in the PR description is appreciated, while not required. Be prepared to explain how the tool was used and what changes it made. |
Looks like some funky line breaking?
| the responsibility of the contributor. We value good code, concise accurate documentation, and avoiding unneeded code | ||
| churn. Discretion, good judgment, and critical thinking are the foundation of all good contributions, regardless of the | ||
| tools used in their creation. | ||
| Generative AI tools are evolving rapidly, and their work can be helpful. As with using any tool, the resulting |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It wasn't done before in this file for some reason, but could we please wrap lines?
No description provided.