Skip to content

Package exposure items #30

Open
Open

Description

@darribas

Starting this issue to discuss ideally how to structure information and meta data about each package so it's easier to consume in "aggregators" (meta-website, notebooks project, etc.). Looping also @knaaptime as per call discussion.

Activity

  1. darribas commented on May 1, 2020

    @darribas
    MemberAuthor

    From the notebooks project, elements that could immediately improve the appearance include:

    • Standard way of storing images present in the README which gets pulled at the introduction of each package notebooks.
    • Going forward, it might be worth thinking whether we want something different from the README to be the introduction. Maybe a short description of the pacakge, what it does and key links? This sounds like what the README should be, but maybe it's different in some contexts. Maybe something like a BLURB.md file which could also be pulled on the website?
  2. weikang9009 commented on May 1, 2020

    @weikang9009
    Member

    Sounds like a great idea.
    We might also want to make sure we are using the same file format for README, .md or .rst.

  3. jGaboardi commented on May 1, 2020

    @jGaboardi
    Member

    Linking the agenda notes where this was originally discussed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions