Skip to content

Should we adapt the expected wording to the changes in Optional N4078 #22

Description

@viboes

N4078 - Fixes for optional objects http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4078.html contains some fixes to Optional that can be adapted to Expected.

Should we take care of them?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions