Repository navigation
blog: Neon alternatives post, checklist order, ORM note and PITR wording - #8508
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info
WalkthroughThe article updates its comparison criteria, Prisma Postgres and Compute details, recovery wording, metadata date, and update history. ChangesArticle comparison and Prisma details
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Change: Other Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to
|
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Description Check |  |
Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled. |
| Title check | |
The title clearly summarizes the main content changes: the Neon alternatives post, checklist order, ORM clarification, and point-in-time recovery wording. |
| Docstring Coverage | |
No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0… |
| Linked Issues check | |
Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check | |
Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
Full details: Docstring Coverage
-
Explanation
No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches
-
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
The Supabase lines from this PR (the Supabase Compute status in the situation table, the Supabase entry and the FAQ on whether Supabase hosts the app) moved to #8525, which also qualifies the Supabase entry's trade-offs line. They will be dropped from this PR on its next rebase. |
Start the checklist with where the frontend, the API and the database run, open the Prisma entry with the note that no Prisma ORM is needed, and remove a duplicate sentence on entry order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The "How we compared" note now says the comparison table and the numbered entries both list vendors in alphabetical order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…e Prisma entry The Prisma entry now opens with "Prisma ORM is optional for both products", matching the first paragraph and the FAQ, and its trade-offs say there is no database branching feature and no point-in-time recovery yet, matching the FAQ and the comparison table. The update-history list gets back its blank line after the heading. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
updatedAt and the new update-history line now carry the date the change can ship. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The "Where Prisma Postgres + Compute is the wrong choice" section now
says "no point-in-time recovery yet", matching the Prisma entry, the
comparison table and the Compute FAQ ("restoring to an arbitrary moment
is not available yet"). The "How we compared" note names the criteria
the comparison table uses (2 to 11) and says what covers criterion 1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
gregory-boch-prisma
changed the title
a5b30cc to
b6772c3
Compare
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Action performedFull review finished. |
|
@coderabbitai approve |
✅ Action performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
This branch was successfully deployed
1 participant
The blog post /blog/neon-vs-prisma-postgres-app-hosting-in-one-place compares Neon with platforms that put app hosting and Postgres in one place. The Supabase Compute note and the Railway PR-environment note that this PR first carried are already on main (#8525, #8532), so after the rebase this PR only changes the checklist order, the Prisma entry and the PITR wording.
Changes
updatedAtis 2026-10-21.No competitor facts change.
Not changed
Title, metaTitle, metaDescription, excerpt, the title prefix and the first paragraph are byte-identical to origin/main (sha256 compared). The post has no
#heading, so the H1 comes from the title. Everything above "## What to compare before you leave Neon", exceptupdatedAt, is also byte-identical, which covers the quick recommendation and the situation table.Checks
tsx scripts/lint.tsin apps/blog (lint:links): 0 errored files, 0 errors.fumadocs-mdxin apps/blog: exit 0.When merging, please use one squash message based on this title and body.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit