Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion apps/blog/content/blog/serverless-postgres/index.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Walk the tree, or read the guidance beneath it.

<ServerlessPostgresChooser />

- **Side project, prototype, or agent-generated app:** you want a generous free tier and zero setup. Prisma Postgres (200k operations, 50 databases, no card), Neon (100 CU-hours across 100 projects), or Supabase (2 projects, if week-idle pausing is acceptable).
- **Side project, prototype, or agent-generated app:** you want a generous free tier and zero setup. Prisma Postgres (200k operations, 50 databases, no card), Neon (100 CU-hours per project, up to 100 projects), or Supabase (2 projects, if week-idle pausing is acceptable).
- **Spiky or scheduled workloads (cron jobs, internal tools, dev/test fleets):** compute-time billing with scale-to-zero was built for this. Neon, or Aurora if you're already on AWS and can tolerate ~15-second resumes.
- **User-facing apps that go idle but have latency-sensitive users:** this is where cold starts hurt. Either keep the database always ready and pay per query (Prisma Postgres), disable auto-suspend on Neon, or run a small always-on instance on PlanetScale ($5) or paid Supabase ($25). The [cost comparison](#the-cost-crossover) below shows how to pick between them.
- **Steady, high-throughput production:** always-on dedicated capacity wins on price-per-query at sustained load. PlanetScale (from $5 single node, $50 Metal), or Aurora sized for the load.
Expand Down
Loading