Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Taurus Rising — TikTok Comment Dataset

Survey-style comment data collected from a TikTok post asking Taurus risings for three placements (Venus, North Node, Saturn), their dreams, and the lessons they've attracted.

Source

  • Post: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebaileygrind_/video/7660139501171395853 (short link: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTSCSNEJn/)
  • Collected: 2026-07-08/12 and 2026-09-04 via stablesocial.dev /api/tiktok/post-comments (Data365 provider), paid through agentcash ($0.06/page). Incremental pulls on Jul 8 built up 91 comments; a 3-page re-pull on Jul 9 (~03:20 UTC) added 52; a newest-first top-up (~04:50 UTC) added 9 more; a full 5-page re-pull on Jul 9 (~23:24 UTC) added 92 more; a newest-first top-up on Jul 10 (~12:43 UTC) added 44 more; a complete eight-page cursor walk on Jul 12 added 67 recent and previously missed comments; a 3-page newest-first overlap walk on Sep 4 added 112 more top-level comments, stopping after the first overlap with the Jul 12 set
  • Coverage: 467 top-level comments accounted for through the Sep 4 overlap walk, deduped on username + timestamp + verbatim text. TikTok's displayed comment count also includes reply threads, which the provider cannot reliably return (see caveats)

Files

  • data/extracted.json — one record per comment: author metadata, verbatim text, and extracted fields (venus_sign/house, nn_sign/house, saturn_sign/house, dreams, lessons_attracted, life_events, notes)
  • data/extracted.csv — same data flattened for spreadsheets
  • data/dream_themes_v2.json — current seven-theme dominant-outcome taxonomy, public descriptions, scoring rubric, and private classification boundaries
  • data/dream_theme_calibration_v2.json — 38 source-linked calibration anchors; these rows are excluded from the 200-response agreement evaluation set
  • data/dream_theme_assignments_v2.json — current primary, co-dominant, and private supporting classifications for the reviewed July Dream responses
  • data/dream_theme_review_v2.json — both full independent passes, the baseline and calibrated reconsideration trail, agreement metrics, adjudications, and source/taxonomy/calibration digests
  • data/dream_themes.json, data/dream_theme_assignments.json, and data/dream_theme_review.json — preserved version 1 multi-label provenance; the page no longer reads these files
  • data/new_batch6.json — the 67 reviewed rows added by the Jul 12 refresh
  • data/new_batch6_page*_raw.json — all eight provider pages from the Jul 12 cursor walk, retained before normalization
  • data/new_batch7.json — the 112 extracted rows added by the Sep 4 refresh
  • data/new_batch7_page*_raw.json — the three provider pages from the Sep 4 newest-first overlap walk, retained before normalization
  • data/new_batch6_reply_test_raw.json — the empty reply-endpoint result for a parent comment reporting 10 replies
  • avatars/ — commenter profile pictures scraped from public TikTok profile pages by fetch_avatars.py for the original July dataset (336/350 users; 14 profiles had no reachable avatar), plus Bailey's own and the Communion logo. Newer Sep 4 users fall back to placeholders until the avatar refresh is run. Inlined into index.html as data URIs at build time.

Extraction was done by LLM reading of each comment, not regex. Paraphrased fields (dreams, lessons_attracted, life_events) summarize the commenter's own words; text is always verbatim for re-checking.

Dream themes are assigned by reading each response, not by keyword search. Version 2 gives each qualifying response one primary outcome and adds a co-dominant theme only for a separate, comparably emphasized aspiration; weaker means, settings, beneficiaries, and consequences remain private supporting evidence. The pie therefore shows the share of themed responses by primary theme, while each response lists its primary and any co-dominant themes as a clean comma-separated line. Theme descriptions appear once in the chart list; scores, evidence, rejected candidates, and detailed boundaries stay out of the page and deployment. The Sep 4 rows are displayed and included in placement, search, CSV, and response counts, but their Dream-theme assignments remain pending; theme filters and the pie chart only include the audited July v2 review set.

Caveats

  • Reply threads missing. The complete Jul 12 pull reports 64 parent comments with 105 replies. The Sep 4 top-level refresh adds 15 new parent comments reporting 23 replies. The provider returns every comment ID as a float-rounded number (trailing zeros), so the comment-replies endpoint cannot match them; a fresh test against a parent reporting 10 replies returned zero items. Notably thethirdperspectiv and ila9030 both have reply threads where the story continues.
  • House systems are mixed. Most commenters appear to use whole-sign; two (__drw___, queridasiulmariam) gave both whole-sign and Placidus. Where both were given, the whole-sign value is in the main columns and Placidus in notes.
  • Missing halves are inferred. When a commenter gave only a house (or only a sign), the other value was filled in assuming whole-sign houses for a Taurus rising (Taurus=1st … Aries=12th). ~18% of respondents who gave both values use Placidus, so a similar share of the 57 inferred values may be off by one. The verbatim text field always preserves exactly what was stated.
  • Self-reported and uneven. Some rows are placements-only, one is a proxy answer for a boyfriend (ila9030), one interpreted "dreams" as literal sleep dreams (destenylazo6), one gave no placements (pidepeterpiper), one is technically an Aries rising at 28° (kellynn.danae).
  • Five commenters have multiple rows: ana974562 (two Portuguese follow-ups), shannaw987 (full comment plus a fragment follow-up, "In Gemini 1st house", 6 minutes later), susspishiz ("Me 🙋‍♀️" then her Venus placement 4 minutes later), beloolaaa (a curiosity note, then a fuller placement/dreams comment), and saturdayaddamss (three placement comments). 467 comments, 461 unique users.

Quick stats (n=467, nulls excluded)

  • Venus sign: Aries 56, Scorpio 45, Taurus 41, Sagittarius 38, Capricorn 37
  • Venus house: 12th 60, 7th 48, 8th 39, 10th 39, 11th 39
  • North Node sign: Leo 55, Capricorn 40, Aries 37, Gemini 37, Taurus 36
  • North Node house: 4th 49, 12th 38, 6th 37, 1st 36, 2nd 36
  • Saturn sign: Taurus 58, Pisces 55, Aquarius 51, Aries 51, Capricorn 37
  • Saturn house: 12th 65, 11th 55, 10th 51, 1st 48, 8th 35
  • 319/467 shared dreams, 245/467 named lessons/attraction patterns, 217/467 described hardships/life events
  • Dream themes: 193/238 reviewed July Dream responses have a qualifying primary theme — Freedom 70, Self-Sufficiency 36, Home / Belonging 33, Cultivation 26, Service 14, Transmission 9, and Stewardship 5. Another 63 reviewed responses have one co-dominant theme, and 17 have two. The 81 Sep 4 Dream responses are pending v2 theme review.

Page

index.html — self-contained viewer (inline Tailwind via CDN, needs network for styles/font). It keeps the six existing placement graphs and adds an interactive reviewed-primary-theme pie with a selectable theme list. Choosing either a theme row or its pie slice filters the same response list by that reviewed primary theme and composes with placement filters and search; co-dominant themes remain visible on reviewed responses. Both run from the smallest, lightest group to the largest, fully solid group, using one even color step per theme. Regenerate after data or theme changes with python3 build_page.py (also rewrites data/extracted.csv). The build fails if reviewed-theme source evidence, provenance, agreement gates, or adjudication records are incomplete or stale.

About

Survey-style TikTok comment dataset: Taurus risings on Venus, north node, and Saturn placements

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages