fix: remove REST docs credential customization form#976
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR removes the interactive server-credential form from the Docs frontend (delete method and its render call), updates the TOC instantiation in ChangesSensitive Data Form Removal
🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
_includes/common/server-customize.md (1)
3-3: 💤 Low valueConsider mentioning all configuration values in the warning.
The warning specifically calls out "master keys, client keys, or REST API keys" but the list below also includes
serverUrlandappId. For consistency and completeness, consider either:
- Using more general language: "never enter or share real credentials or configuration values..."
- Being explicit: "never enter or share real server URLs, app IDs, master keys, client keys, or REST API keys..."
The current phrasing correctly emphasizes the most sensitive values, so this is primarily a consistency consideration.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@_includes/common/server-customize.md` at line 3, Update the warning sentence to include all configuration values by either using a general phrase or enumerating the items; e.g., replace the current specific list ("master keys, client keys, or REST API keys") with a broader phrase like "real credentials or configuration values (e.g., serverUrl, appId, master keys, client keys, REST API keys)" so that serverUrl and appId are explicitly protected in the same message.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@_includes/common/server-customize.md`:
- Line 3: Update the warning sentence to include all configuration values by
either using a general phrase or enumerating the items; e.g., replace the
current specific list ("master keys, client keys, or REST API keys") with a
broader phrase like "real credentials or configuration values (e.g., serverUrl,
appId, master keys, client keys, REST API keys)" so that serverUrl and appId are
explicitly protected in the same message.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 8a891527-3897-488d-9c8e-826a14554838
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
_app/main.js_includes/common/server-customize.mdassets/js/bundle.js
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- _app/main.js
Fixes #898
What changed
assets/js/bundle.js.Checks
npm installnpm run webpacknode --check _app/main.jsgit diff --checkbundle exec jekyll buildwas attempted locally but could not run in this VM because the available Ruby is 2.6.10 and the resolvednokogiri-1.16.5requires Ruby >= 3.0.Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation