ARAP: carry authorization-relevant Context in the re-evaluation example - #691
Open
vatsalgupta wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
vatsalgupta wants to merge 1 commit into
vatsalgupta wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The submission example states that `project` was authorization-relevant in the original evaluation and preserves it. The re-evaluation example for the same Subject, Resource, Action, and approval sent only `time` and `approval`, so a PEP following it would fail the exact-match approval-scope comparison with `out_of_scope`. Link the re-evaluation example to the submission example and include `project` in its Context. No normative text changes; the rule that the PEP resends the original Context is left to openid#663. Refs openid#663
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The submission example states that
projectwas authorization-relevant in the original evaluation and preserves it. The re-evaluation example for the same Subject, Resource, Action, and approval sends onlytimeandapproval, so a PEP following it would fail the exact-match approval-scope comparison without_of_scope.This links the re-evaluation example to the submission example and includes
projectin its Context.No normative text changes. The rule that the PEP resends the original Context is left to #663.
Refs #663