Skip to content

test: Ensure back-compat of new _code fields in TOML archives #552

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
kdmccormick wants to merge 1 commit into from
+17 −0
Closed

test: Ensure back-compat of new _code fields in TOML archives #552

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions ...ng/apps/authoring/backup_restore/fixtures/library_backup/entities/subsection1-48afa3.toml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,14 @@ version_num = 2
[entity.published]
# unpublished: no published_version_num

# Starting with https://github.com/openedx/openedx-core/pull/545,
# containers will derive their identity from `container_code` instead of
# from `key` (although archives without a `container_code` will fall back
# to `key`). We're adding this bit to the test fixture ahead of time to
# ensure that older (Ulmo) code is forward-compatible with archives
# containing `container_code`.
[entity.container.subsection]
container_code = "subsection1-48afa3"

# ### Versions

Expand Down
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions ...fixtures/library_backup/entities/xblock.v1/html/c22b9f97-f1e9-4e8f-87f0-d5a3c26083e2.toml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,6 +9,16 @@ version_num = 2
[entity.published]
version_num = 2

# Starting with https://github.com/openedx/openedx-core/pull/544,
# components will derive their type and code from these attributes rather
# than by parsing `key` (although archives without an [entity.component] section
# will fall back to parsing `key`). We're adding this bit to the test fixture
# early, ensuring that older (Ulmo) code is forward-compatible with archives
# containing the [entity.component] section.
[entity.component]
component_type = "xblock.v1:html"
component_code = "c22b9f97-f1e9-4e8f-87f0-d5a3c26083e2"

# ### Versions

[[version]]
Expand Down