fix(constraint): preserve AddData integer precision during JSON round-trip

[sozercan]

Motivation

• Client.AddData previously round-tripped referential/inventory data using encoding/json Marshal/Unmarshal, which decodes numbers to float64 and can lose precision for integers > 2^53.
• The local Rego driver disables in‑memory RoundTripOnWrite, so callers must preserve numeric precision when preparing data for driver storage to avoid policy-evaluation corruption.

Description

• Replaced the encoding/json Marshal/Unmarshal round-trip in Client.AddData with OPA's util.RoundTrip to preserve numeric precision by decoding numbers as json.Number (UseNumber).
• Removed the unused encoding/json import and added github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/v1/util to the imports in constraint/pkg/client/client.go.
• The change is minimal and localized to the data round-trip step so untyped JSON coercion for drivers is preserved while avoiding float64 precision loss; the inmem.OptRoundTripOnWrite(false) performance behavior is unchanged.

Testing

• Ran go test ./pkg/client -run TestClient_AddData -count=1 and the test passed (ok github.com/open-policy-agent/frameworks/constraint/pkg/client).
• Built and ran the client package tests locally with go test ./pkg/client and observed successful completion for the modified unit test(s).

---

Codex Task

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR updates Client.AddData to avoid integer precision loss when round-tripping referential/inventory data through JSON before writing to driver storage.

Changes:

• Replaced encoding/json marshal/unmarshal round-trip with opa/util.RoundTrip (UseNumber) to preserve numeric precision.
• Removed the unused encoding/json import and added github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/v1/util.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
constraint/pkg/client/client.go	Uses OPA’s JSON round-trip helper to prevent large integer coercion to float64 during AddData processing.

Copilot's findings

Tip

Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

• Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
• Comments generated: 1

[Copilot]

Review details

• Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
• Comments generated: 0 new
• Review effort level: Balanced

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5ba5f11f24

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

[sozercan]

@codex review

[Copilot]

Review details

• Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
• Comments generated: 0 new
• Review effort level: Balanced

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: 1b2406aede

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".