test(flagd): adopt the OpenFeature Provider TCK - #1847

Draft

aepfli wants to merge 25 commits into

feat/provider-tckfrom

feat/provider-tck-flagd

Commits on Oct 2, 2026

test(flagd): adopt the OpenFeature Provider TCK
aepfli
committed
a837aa6
test(flagd): declare the numeric-coercion gap as a defect, not a choice
aepfli
committed
1dfe322
test(flagd): record what flagd-testbed does not serve, and why that is not a deviation
aepfli
committed
e42458b
test(flagd): withhold @reinitialization, and settle @stale by evidence
aepfli
committed
aeb7ed2
test(flagd): withhold @large-integers explicitly
aepfli
committed
085c164
docs(flagd): say what the new tags gate here, and what the testbed still owes
aepfli
committed
7de6f99
test(flagd): declare @disabled-flags, on the evidence of both resolvers
aepfli
committed
5501060
test(flagd): follow the provider-tck -> tck rename
aepfli
committed
f7245be
test(flagd): give the in-process resolver a deadline its sync can meet
aepfli
committed
6d41ecd
test(flagd): declare numeric coercion and let its failure show
aepfli
committed
ea42598
docs(flagd): say that the TCK suites are Docker-gated and hand-run
aepfli
committed
96f9492
test(flagd): keep the TCK suites out of CI, which the e2e profile was not doing
aepfli
committed
417f994
docs(flagd): point at Appendix F for the CI-exclusion reasoning
aepfli
committed
4eb74ca
test(flagd): record that both resolvers report the standard reasons
aepfli
committed
c9cf6b4
test(flagd): stop withholding a capability nobody in Java can hold
aepfli
committed
2d6bb35
docs(flagd): cite the declaring rule this adoption argued out in longhand
aepfli
committed
8d5d4ee
test(flagd): run the conformance suites from a step of their own
aepfli
committed
7aa92a1
test(flagd): give the conformance adoption a package of its own
aepfli
committed
418af51
docs(flagd): cut the conformance section to what is this adoption's
aepfli
committed
91efe84
test(flagd): one Compose file for both adoptions, and cut the prose around it
aepfli
committed
046c6a5
test(flagd): follow @disabled-flags' corrected gating question
aepfli
committed
950a469
test(flagd): record the intermittent testbed failure observed here too
aepfli
committed
50305f8
test(tck): run the conformance suite against flagd-testbed v3.10.1
aepfli
committed
7b0500e
test(flagd): declare @string-typing, on a run rather than on the default
aepfli
committed
4a66284
test(flagd): declare @fully-typed-values too, on a run in both modes
aepfli
committed
5d439f9

Navigation Menu

test(flagd): adopt the OpenFeature Provider TCK - #1847

test(flagd): adopt the OpenFeature Provider TCK#1847
aepfli wants to merge 25 commits into
feat/provider-tckfrom
feat/provider-tck-flagd

Commits on Oct 2, 2026

test(flagd): adopt the OpenFeature Provider TCK

test(flagd): declare the numeric-coercion gap as a defect, not a choice

test(flagd): record what flagd-testbed does not serve, and why that is not a deviation

test(flagd): withhold @reinitialization, and settle @stale by evidence

test(flagd): withhold @large-integers explicitly

docs(flagd): say what the new tags gate here, and what the testbed still owes

test(flagd): declare @disabled-flags, on the evidence of both resolvers

test(flagd): follow the provider-tck -> tck rename

test(flagd): give the in-process resolver a deadline its sync can meet

test(flagd): declare numeric coercion and let its failure show

docs(flagd): say that the TCK suites are Docker-gated and hand-run

test(flagd): keep the TCK suites out of CI, which the e2e profile was not doing

docs(flagd): point at Appendix F for the CI-exclusion reasoning

test(flagd): record that both resolvers report the standard reasons

test(flagd): stop withholding a capability nobody in Java can hold

docs(flagd): cite the declaring rule this adoption argued out in longhand

test(flagd): run the conformance suites from a step of their own

test(flagd): give the conformance adoption a package of its own

docs(flagd): cut the conformance section to what is this adoption's

test(flagd): one Compose file for both adoptions, and cut the prose around it

test(flagd): follow @disabled-flags' corrected gating question

test(flagd): record the intermittent testbed failure observed here too

test(tck): run the conformance suite against flagd-testbed v3.10.1

test(flagd): declare @string-typing, on a run rather than on the default

test(flagd): declare @fully-typed-values too, on a run in both modes