Add blog post on making Formisch easier for coding agents

[flySewa]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a blog post describing Formisch’s support for coding agents.
  • Documented framework-specific examples, API types, coding-agent guides, and dedicated Formisch and Valibot skills.
  • Added guidance for Markdown and llms.txt documentation access, including setup commands, configuration examples, and available MCP tools.
  • Clarified framework-agnostic API usage and provided links to framework-specific coding-agent resources.

[coderabbitai]

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

• @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

• ▶️ Resume reviews
• 🔍 Trigger review

Walkthrough

Adds a blog post that documents Formisch support for coding agents. It covers corrected framework examples, Markdown and framework-specific llms.txt routes, Formisch and Valibot skills, an unauthenticated MCP server, static documentation generation, and framework-agnostic API design. It also includes setup commands, MCP tool descriptions, and links to coding-agent guides.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the added blog post about making Formisch easier for coding agents.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 1 file

_{Re-trigger cubic}

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 1 file

_{Re-trigger cubic}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In
`@website/src/routes/blog/`(posts)/making-formisch-easier-for-coding-agents/index.mdx:
- Around line 39-41: Update the framework-specific llms file description near
the four-file explanation to clarify that each index excludes documentation for
the other frameworks but includes shared methods/api and core/api pages. Replace
the claim that an agent loads only Vue documentation with wording consistent
with the shared content behavior described later.
- Line 79: Update the paragraph describing the three tools to distinguish their
parameters: state that search_docs and list_docs optionally accept a framework,
while get_doc requires a path that includes the framework, such as
react/api/useForm. Remove wording that implies get_doc accepts a framework
parameter.

🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 80758523-cb6c-48c9-acee-c614792ba736

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 404aeba and dd779ea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• website/src/routes/blog/(posts)/making-formisch-easier-for-coding-agents/index.mdx

[fabian-hiller]

Thank you! Great post. I wonder if we reorder the sections and move the most interesting ones like the MCP section to the top.