Skip to content

chore: set codeowners to EX pod - #669

Open
serhalp wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
serhalp/codeowners
Open

serhalp wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
serhalp/codeowners

Conversation

@serhalp

@serhalp serhalp commented Oct 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@serhalp
serhalp requested a review from a team as a code owner October 22, 2026 18:27
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Deploy Preview for open-api ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b17978d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/open-api/deploys/6ada5580bde976d8fbc47d6c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-669--open-api.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes Run an agent on this branch

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-10-22T18:27:13.333213Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
b17978d PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Team
  • Run ID: 399cae27-0b4f-4d60-88c1-cf43bd5712d0
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3928aef and b17978d.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. 6 included reviews remain after this review. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 10 reviews per hour.

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated project maintenance ownership assignments. This change does not affect product functionality or the end-user experience.

The global CODEOWNERS entry now assigns ownership to @netlify/pod-experience. The separate ownership entries for docs/ and swagger.yml were removed.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: aarthykc

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to b1797

No actionable merge-blocking risk was identified.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 4 · Inconclusive 1

Failed Failed checks: 1 inconclusive

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check Inconclusive No pull request description was provided. The changeset is understandable from the title and summary, but the description check cannot confirm author-provided context. Add a short description that states the CODEOWNERS change and identifies the new owning team.
Passed Passed checks: 4 passed
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: assigning CODEOWNERS ownership to the EX pod.
Docstring Coverage Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Linked repositories: Some configured repositories could not be included in this review. Cross-repository analysis may be incomplete. Please check linked-repository access and settings.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant