Skip to content

docs(core): archive wrap-fill-and-copywithin and sync its spec - #189

Merged
nerdalytics merged 1 commit into
trunkfrom
docs/archive-wrap-fill-and-copywithin
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

nerdalytics merged 1 commit into
trunkfrom
docs/archive-wrap-fill-and-copywithin

Conversation

@nerdalytics

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Description

Archives the OpenSpec change behind #188 and syncs the fill and copyWithin scenarios from its delta into the main array-mutation spec, which ticket 03 had left without them. The commit missed #188 because it was never pushed before the merge.

Changes Made

  • openspec/changes/wrap-fill-and-copywithin/ moves to openspec/changes/archive/2026-10-25-wrap-fill-and-copywithin/ with the ticked tickets.
  • openspec/specs/array-mutation/spec.md gains the fill and copyWithin scenarios in six requirements; the seventh requirement and the purpose are unchanged.
  • The run's ledger, four inbox notes and six review packages under .do/ come along, as the previous archive commit a7e06bc did.

Performance Impact

None. No file under src/, tests/ or scripts/ changes.

Test Coverage

openspec validate --specs passes on this commit and openspec list reports no open change.

Related Issues

Follows #188.

Checklist

  • Tests added/updated for changes (not applicable, docs only)
  • Documentation updated
  • All tests passing
  • Code formatting checked
  • Performance implications considered
  • Breaking changes documented (if applicable)

The change is implemented and landed on this branch, so its planning
files move to the dated archive with the ticked tickets, together with
the run's ledger, its four inbox notes and its six review packages. The
main array-mutation spec gains the fill and copyWithin scenarios from
the delta, which ticket 03 had left out when it renamed the method count.
@nerdalytics
nerdalytics merged commit 65c24f3 into trunk Oct 25, 2026
12 checks passed
@nerdalytics
nerdalytics deleted the docs/archive-wrap-fill-and-copywithin branch October 25, 2026 20:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant