feat: usage counter fields on payment OfferResp - #1513
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. Walkthrough
ChangesOffer response contract
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Change: Feature Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The offer response contract is extended compatibly, and Juspay leaves the new optional values absent as intended. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. A rabbit checks the offer’s flow Comment |
bec965d to
aa8ff7d
Compare
Optional minimumAmount and a counters object (frequencyType, appliedCount, maxApplyCount) for domain offers; the Juspay adapter leaves both empty.
aa8ff7d to
53f9356
Compare
Optional minimumAmount and a counters object (frequencyType, appliedCount, maxApplyCount) on Interface.Types.OfferResp for domain offers; the Juspay adapter leaves both empty.
Type of Change
Description
Additional Changes
Motivation and Context
How did you test it?
Checklist
./dev/format-all-files.shSummary by CodeRabbit