Conversation
The series builds its Core layers on current upstream sdk-rust main, so the bridge moves to the 1.0 crates and the protos follow upstream's api drift.
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR repins
temporalio/bridge/sdk-coreto upstream sdk-rustmainand brings the bridge up to it.What changed?
temporalio-clientgets theexperimentalfeature.temporalio/apiandtemporalio/bridge/protoare regenerated from that Core's api tree, so upstream's drift comes in here. That includes the newnexusoperationandnotificationservicepackages and thecauseon external signal and cancel results. It also includes theinclude_arguments_in_markerrename, which no Python code uses.temporal_link_to_nexus_linkrefuses the new upstreamcallbacklink variant, the same way it refusesbatch_job. The pin forces this one, since the link oneof gained the variant.Part of AI-198 (epic AI-37).
Why?
The old pin is an "Update api_upstream" commit that upstream
mainnever got. The Core work for AI-198 sits on currentmain, so the Python side needs a bridge that compiles against it first. Nothing here is about streams or channels. It's the chore on its own, and it could go upstream as is.How did you test it?
Link to a test plan if any -
The bridge builds, and
cargo clippy -- -D warningsandpoe lintare clean. Running thepoe gen-protosgenerators a second time leaves the tree as committed. The client, activity, workflow, Nexus, replayer, visitor and converter suites pass against the dev server the fixtures start.