Repository navigation
Move repeat scheduling to the message action bar - #1768
Merged
Paul Lizer (paullizer) merged 1 commit intoOct 15, 2026
Merged
Paul Lizer (paullizer) merged 1 commit into
Paul Lizer (paullizer) merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Paul Lizer (paullizer)
merged commit Oct 15, 2026
dcfedf0
into
paullizer-react-v2-ui
12 checks passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Linked issue
N/A. The user chose not to create an issue for this change.
Release Notes & Latest Features
Is this visible to end users?
Is this admin-facing (Admin Settings, governance, deployment, config)?
Should this become a Latest Feature card?
Screenshot needed for the card?
Version bump
application/single_app/config.pyVERSIONthird segment bumped, or not needed because this is docs-onlydeployers/version.txtbumped, or not needed becausedeployers/was not changedApplication version:
0.261.337->0.261.338. No deployer changes.Testing / validation
npm --prefix .\application\v2_ui run build -- --outDir ..\..\ui_tests\artifacts\orchestration-plan-editor- passed, including TypeScript compilation. Vite reports its existing large-chunk warning..\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m pytest .\ui_tests\test_v2_workflow_plan_replay_card.py -q --tb=short- passed, 27 tests. Covers real components with production CSS, desktop/light and mobile/dark layouts, hover/keyboard reveal, placement, collapse/reopen, eligibility, stale-run/masking changes, errors, and existing save/refusal behavior..\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m pytest .\functional_tests\test_v2_message_actions.py -q -k 'not retry_and_edit_are_two_step_flows' --tb=short- passed, 7 tests; 1 existing test excluded as described below.node --test .\functional_tests\test_v2_workflow_plan_replay_client.mjs- passed, 9 tests.python .\scripts\build_docs_inventory.py- passed; generated inventory content is unchanged.python .\functional_tests\test_docs_app_surface_coverage.py- passed, 7 checks.python .\functional_tests\test_docs_site_quality.py- passed, 6 checks.git -c core.whitespace=blank-at-eol,blank-at-eof,space-before-tab,cr-at-eol diff --check- passed.Known pre-existing test failure:
test_retry_and_edit_are_two_step_flowsexpects the source literal'chat_request': chat_request, but the existing route returns'chat_request': body. The unchanged test fromHEADreproduced the same assertion failure. This PR leaves the unrelated assertion and production Retry behavior unchanged rather than treating the failure as a pass.Documentation
Updated the workflow plan replay feature documentation, chat-control reference, and workflow creation guide. Added
docs/explanation/fixes/PLAN_REPLAY_MESSAGE_ACTION_FIX.mdwith behavior, version, coverage, and validation details. Release notes were not updated in this change.Security checklist
@swagger_route(security=get_auth_security())sanitize_settings_for_user()No Flask routes, authorization boundaries, or settings-response handling changed. The calendar uses the existing locally bundled Lucide icon. Existing replay eligibility and inert hostile-text browser coverage are retained.