Skip to content

Revise README order and remove markdown box - #135

Open
rcarteraz wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
rcarteraz-patch-1
Open

Revise README order and remove markdown box#135
rcarteraz wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
rcarteraz-patch-1

Conversation

@rcarteraz

@rcarteraz rcarteraz commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Updated README to revise the order and remove a markdown box that did not appear to belong there (and broke a link).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a standalone Meshtastic Design Standards section to the README.
    • Retained GitHub Copilot configuration guidance.
    • Removed the duplicated embedded Markdown example.

Updated README to revise the order and remove a markdown box that did not appear to belong there (and broke a link).
@rcarteraz
rcarteraz requested a review from garthvh August 11, 2026 18:20
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README now presents Meshtastic Design Standards as a standalone section. The GitHub Copilot section retains its configuration guidance and instructs repositories to include the standards guidance.

Changes

README documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Separate design standards from Copilot guidance
README.md
The README adds a standalone Design Standards section with UI compliance guidance. The Copilot example no longer embeds the standards text.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Poem

I’m a rabbit with a tidy README to share,
Design standards now stand in the open air.
Copilot guidance stays clear and bright,
Six lines added to make the layout right.
Hop, hop—clean docs delight!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the README order change and removal of the markdown box.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 99-100: Fix the incomplete instruction in the README section
preceding “## Stats”: either restore the missing fenced
`.github/copilot-instructions.md` configuration content after the “following
section” sentence, or rewrite that sentence to specify the exact text readers
must add. Ensure the resulting documentation is actionable and no longer
references absent content.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f8a411d7-f05e-49bb-b88c-c8cde8c714c2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 915c391 and 6f2602c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Comment thread README.md
Comment on lines +99 to +100
Add the following section to your repository's `.github/copilot-instructions.md` file (create the file if it doesn't exist):

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Restore the missing Copilot configuration section.

Line 99 refers to “the following section,” but no section follows before ## Stats on Line 101. Readers cannot copy the required .github/copilot-instructions.md content. Either restore a fenced configuration snippet or change the sentence to identify the exact text to add.

Proposed wording fix
-Add the following section to your repository's `.github/copilot-instructions.md` file (create the file if it doesn't exist):
+Copy the `Design Standards` guidance above into your repository's `.github/copilot-instructions.md` file (create the file if it doesn't exist):
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Add the following section to your repository's `.github/copilot-instructions.md` file (create the file if it doesn't exist):
Copy the `Design Standards` guidance above into your repository's `.github/copilot-instructions.md` file (create the file if it doesn't exist):
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~99-~99: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... following section to your repository's .github/copilot-instructions.md file (create t...

(GITHUB)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@README.md` around lines 99 - 100, Fix the incomplete instruction in the
README section preceding “## Stats”: either restore the missing fenced
`.github/copilot-instructions.md` configuration content after the “following
section” sentence, or rewrite that sentence to specify the exact text readers
must add. Ensure the resulting documentation is actionable and no longer
references absent content.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant