Skip to content

Solution - #1124

Closed
alexsand-r wants to merge 2 commits into
mate-academy:mainfrom
alexsand-r:js_split_integer
Closed

alexsand-r wants to merge 2 commits into
mate-academy:mainfrom
alexsand-r:js_split_integer

Conversation

@alexsand-r

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Your test file has a critical import issue that prevents all tests from running. The test uses const { splitInteger } = require('./splitInteger') expecting a named export, but your implementation in splitInteger.js uses module.exports = splitInteger which is a default export. This causes splitInteger to be undefined at runtime, making all test assertions fail.

To fix this, change the import in src/splitInteger.test.js from:

const { splitInteger } = require('./splitInteger');

to:

const splitInteger = require('./splitInteger');

The test logic itself is well-structured and covers all the requirements (splitting into equal parts, single part returns value, ascending sort, max-min difference <= 1, and edge cases for value < numberOfParts). Once you fix the import, the tests should pass.


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Important

Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.

Tip

If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.

Caution

Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example ↩

  2. Re-request AI review example ↩

  3. Add AI review comments example ↩

Comment thread src/splitInteger.test.js Outdated
@@ -2,12 +2,29 @@

const splitInteger = require('./splitInteger');

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The import is incorrect. The implementation uses module.exports = splitInteger (default export), but the test uses require('./splitInteger') without destructuring. This makes splitInteger undefined. Either change to const splitInteger = require('./splitInteger'); or use const { splitInteger } = require('./splitInteger'); if it were a named export.

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Your solution is approved. The implementation correctly handles all requirements: splitting into equal parts when divisible, returning single values, sorting ascending, ensuring max-min difference is <=1, and handling edge cases where value < numberOfParts. The named export in module.exports = { splitInteger } properly matches the destructured import in the test file. All functionality is working as expected.


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example ↩

Comment thread src/splitInteger.test.js
'use strict';

const splitInteger = require('./splitInteger');
const { splitInteger } = require('./splitInteger');

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This import uses destructuring which expects a named export, but the implementation uses a default export. Change to: const splitInteger = require('./splitInteger');

@alexsand-r alexsand-r closed this by deleting the head repository Nov 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants