Conversation
Link webhook mentions to /global-accounts/platform-tools/webhooks in the overview and approvals pages. Link "internal accounts" in policies page to /platform-overview/core-concepts/account-model.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
|
Greptile SummaryThis PR adds contextual hyperlinks in three agents documentation pages: webhook mentions in Confidence Score: 4/5Safe to merge — all link targets verified; only a minor formatting nit present All three new links resolve to existing mintlify/global-accounts/agents/approvals-and-audit.mdx — minor blank-line removal before a heading
|
| Filename | Overview |
|---|---|
| mintlify/global-accounts/agents/approvals-and-audit.mdx | Adds two webhook links pointing to /global-accounts/platform-tools/webhooks; a blank line before one heading was accidentally removed |
| mintlify/global-accounts/agents/overview.mdx | Adds one webhook link to /global-accounts/platform-tools/webhooks; target file confirmed to exist |
| mintlify/global-accounts/agents/policies-and-permissions.mdx | Links "internal accounts" to /platform-overview/core-concepts/account-model; target file confirmed to exist |
Flowchart
%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A["agents/overview.mdx"] -->|"webhook link added"| W["platform-tools/webhooks"]
B["agents/approvals-and-audit.mdx"] -->|"2 webhook links added"| W
C["agents/policies-and-permissions.mdx"] -->|"internal accounts link added"| M["core-concepts/account-model"]
Prompt To Fix All With AI
Fix the following 1 code review issue. Work through them one at a time, proposing concise fixes.
---
### Issue 1 of 1
mintlify/global-accounts/agents/approvals-and-audit.mdx:114
**Missing blank line before heading**
The blank line that previously separated the "Pause and revoke" section body from the `## What to show in the approval UI` heading was accidentally removed in this diff. Mintlify (and most Markdown renderers) typically render headings cleanly without the blank line, but it is inconsistent with the surrounding section separators in this file and departs from the repo's formatting conventions.
```suggestion
Grid enforces these controls. Your product should surface the current connection state and expose the relevant actions in your own experience.
## What to show in the approval UI
```
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs(agents): add webhook and account mo..." | Re-trigger Greptile
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| Grid enforces these controls. Your product should surface the current connection state and expose the relevant actions in your own experience. | ||
|
|
||
| ## What to show in the approval UI |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The blank line that previously separated the "Pause and revoke" section body from the ## What to show in the approval UI heading was accidentally removed in this diff. Mintlify (and most Markdown renderers) typically render headings cleanly without the blank line, but it is inconsistent with the surrounding section separators in this file and departs from the repo's formatting conventions.
| ## What to show in the approval UI | |
| Grid enforces these controls. Your product should surface the current connection state and expose the relevant actions in your own experience. | |
| ## What to show in the approval UI |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: mintlify/global-accounts/agents/approvals-and-audit.mdx
Line: 114
Comment:
**Missing blank line before heading**
The blank line that previously separated the "Pause and revoke" section body from the `## What to show in the approval UI` heading was accidentally removed in this diff. Mintlify (and most Markdown renderers) typically render headings cleanly without the blank line, but it is inconsistent with the surrounding section separators in this file and departs from the repo's formatting conventions.
```suggestion
Grid enforces these controls. Your product should surface the current connection state and expose the relevant actions in your own experience.
## What to show in the approval UI
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
2 participants
Summary
/global-accounts/platform-tools/webhooks/platform-overview/core-concepts/account-modelto clarify terminologyTest plan