Repository navigation
Document that the Helm chart's automatic scale-down needs helm upgrade, not GitOps syncs (+4 more) - #1637
Closed
lightdash-bot wants to merge 5 commits into
Closed
Document that the Helm chart's automatic scale-down needs helm upgrade, not GitOps syncs (+4 more)#1637lightdash-bot wants to merge 5 commits into
lightdash-bot wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
Contributor
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
|
Contributor
Documentation validation✅ All blocking checks passed. Component system0 finding(s) across the corpus. Findings on lines this pull request touched are annotated inline in Files changed. |
…e, not GitOps syncs
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Docs changes Cloudy's docs writer made from support threads on Friday 30 October 2026. One commit per change, described below in order; review by commit and comment on any to drop or change. Every commit builds on current main, so merge whenever it is green, including midday for an urgent fix: later changes that day start a new PR.
Document how to troubleshoot the self-hosted usage analytics nightly refresh
Pages
What changes
Usage processing stage started/finishedlog pairs and outcomesusersstage, its log lines, and why People can be empty while other dashboards have dataWhy
Self-hosted admins had no way to tell from docs whether the nightly usage-processing job ran, what its log lines mean, or why the People dashboards specifically can stay empty while others have data.
Checked against
packages/backend/src/analytics/eventStream/UsageEventsCompactor.tspackages/backend/src/analytics/eventStream/UsageUserActivityBuilder.tspackages/backend/src/analytics/eventStream/usageProcessingWindow.tspackages/backend/src/scheduler/SchedulerWorker.tspackages/backend/src/config/parseConfig.tsCloudy found this docs gap while working a support thread. Started from this internal Slack thread (Lightdash workspace only).
Note that there's no admin view of personal warehouse credentials
Pages
What changes
Why
Admins planning personal credential rollout had no documented answer on whether they could see who had configured credentials for a project.
Checked against
packages/backend/src/controllers/projectController.tspackages/backend/src/services/ProjectService/ProjectService.tspackages/backend/src/models/UserWarehouseCredentials/UserWarehouseCredentialsModel.tsA teammate answered a support question that the docs should have covered. Started from this internal Slack thread (Lightdash workspace only).
Document that service accounts can't hold or use personal warehouse credentials
Pages
What changes
Why
The service accounts reference page didn't say whether a service account could hold or use warehouse credentials, leaving readers evaluating it for per-user warehouse access with no documented answer.
Checked against
packages/backend/src/services/ProjectService/ProjectService.tspackages/backend/src/ee/authentication/serviceAccount.mock.tspackages/common/src/types/warehouseConnections.tspackages/backend/src/services/WarehouseClientFactory/personalCredentialOverlay.tsA teammate answered a support question that the docs should have covered. Started from this internal Slack thread (Lightdash workspace only).
Document API-based service account provisioning
Pages
What changes
Why
The service accounts page covered UI creation and a generic API auth snippet but had no guidance for provisioning accounts through the API, and understated the risk of leaving the LD_SETUP_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN bootstrap configured.
Checked against
packages/backend/src/ee/controllers/serviceAccountsController.tspackages/backend/src/auth/account/account.tspackages/backend/src/services/InstanceConfigurationService/InstanceConfigurationService.tspackages/common/src/ee/serviceAccounts/types.tspackages/common/src/authorization/organizationMemberAbility.tsCloudy found this docs gap while working a support thread. Started from this internal Slack thread (Lightdash workspace only).
Document that the Helm chart's automatic scale-down needs helm upgrade, not GitOps syncs
Pages
What changes
helm upgrade, not ArgoCD/Flux template syncsUNSAFEWhy
Readers applying the Helm chart through ArgoCD or Flux's template mode had no way to know the chart's automatic scale-down silently never runs for them, so they could upgrade an UNSAFE release with old pods still live against the new schema.
Cloudy found this docs gap while working a support thread. Started from this internal Slack thread (Lightdash workspace only).