Skip to content

docs(devlog): record the Kiro contract landed-state verification - #3015

Closed
lidge-jun wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
codex/kiro-terminal-contract-closeout
Closed

docs(devlog): record the Kiro contract landed-state verification#3015
lidge-jun wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
codex/kiro-terminal-contract-closeout

Conversation

@lidge-jun

@lidge-jun lidge-jun commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Follow-up to #3014: records the landed-state verification for the Kiro terminal completion contract unit. Documentation only.

After both merges, all four changed surfaces were read back out of origin/dev at 6f75616f0 rather than from the working tree: the terminal schema description in src/adapters/kiro.ts, the appended terminal clause in src/adapters/kiro-constants.ts, the both-surfaces regression test in tests/kiro-adapter.test.ts, and the close-out record itself. The merge trail (f5a625cf3 for #3012, 6f75616f0 for #3014) is recorded alongside it.

Verification

  • bun run privacy:scan passes.
  • bun test tests/kiro-adapter.test.ts tests/kiro-stream.test.ts tests/tool-catalog-nudge.test.ts — 197 pass / 0 fail, unchanged by this docs commit.
  • Nothing in the build, typecheck, or test path reads from devlog/.

Checklist

  • Scope stays focused and avoids unrelated cleanup.
  • Docs or release notes were updated when needed.
  • Security-sensitive changes were reviewed for secrets, auth, and unsafe defaults.

No GUI change, no runtime change.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a close-out record for the completed terminal workflow contract.
    • Documented preserved mid-task behavior, validation coverage, resolved review feedback, and follow-up measurement requirements.
    • Recorded verification results, including an unrelated CI failure.

Records the terminal outcome, the merge of #3012 as f5a625c, why the one CI
failure is pre-existing on dev, and what was done with each review finding -
including a truncation guard that was implemented, measured unreachable, and
reverted rather than shipped with a test that could not detect its own removal.

The follow-up is the post-change selection-rate comparison; the pre-change
number is 25 completion calls across 4069 required-mode attempts.
@lidge-jun
lidge-jun requested a review from Ingwannu as a code owner August 30, 2026 15:36
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-30T15:38:52.337407Z b853d51 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 30, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 7fb1ce93-8c5b-4787-84ea-7bc2834382a8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f75616 and b853d51.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • devlog/_plan/260830_kiro_post_answer_tool_calls/020_close_out.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 5 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Added a close-out record for the Kiro completion contract shipped in PR #3012. The record covers affected surfaces, preserved mid-task behavior, regression coverage, verification results, CI failure attribution, resolved review findings, follow-up measurements, and verification against origin/dev.

Changes

Kiro completion contract

Layer / File(s) Summary
Close-out record
devlog/_plan/260830_kiro_post_answer_tool_calls/020_close_out.md
Documents the shipped Kiro completion contract, affected schema and instruction surfaces, regression tests, typecheck/test/privacy verification, unrelated CI failure, resolved review findings, follow-up measurements, and landed-state checks.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to b853d

This change only records verification details in project documentation and does not alter product behavior or runtime code; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains.

Suggested reviewers: ingwannu

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies a documentation change that records verification of the Kiro contract. It matches the pull request objective and is concise and specific.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
⚔️ Resolve merge conflicts 💡
  • Resolve merge conflict in branch codex/kiro-terminal-contract-closeout
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/kiro-terminal-contract-closeout

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@lidge-jun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Superseded by a clean re-branch: this head still carried the commit that #3014 squashed, so the merge could not be created. Reopened from current dev with only the 13 new lines.

@lidge-jun lidge-jun closed this Aug 30, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b853d510a0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
# Close-out — terminal completion contract shipped

Terminal outcome: **DONE**.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Move the completed unit to _fin

This file declares a terminal DONE outcome while adding the record under devlog/_plan, which is reserved for open units; leaving it there makes the repository's open-work inventory incorrectly report this shipped unit as active. Move the entire 260830_kiro_post_answer_tool_calls directory to devlog/_fin/ as part of the close-out.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L83-L86

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@lidge-jun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Landed via #3016 at 1031b6f

@lidge-jun lidge-jun added the landed-via-maintainer Original PR closed after landing via a maintainer merge train label Aug 30, 2026
@lidge-jun
lidge-jun deleted the codex/kiro-terminal-contract-closeout branch September 2, 2026 10:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation landed-via-maintainer Original PR closed after landing via a maintainer merge train

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant