Repository navigation
ThreadDesk 0.2: gemeinsame Bedienung, Papierkorb, Aktivitätsgraph und Backup v3 - #95
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 81d617a654
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ef3168d386
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8c99527711
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6cc3763123
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
landjunge
changed the title
Close six PR95 review findings with JSON/SQLite regressions. Preserve explicit CLI revisions and trash-bound payloads, import new tombstones atomically, retain every verified source observation across retries and versions, and preserve legacy backup case compatibility without relaxing v3 guards.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4e31f82ef8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: cf8358d5fb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Retain bounded missing payloads in existing sync receipts for explicit restored-history adoption. Preserve receiver edits, generation checks, atomic replay and purge reduction. Select native project objects before resolving portable origins for export, writes, lifecycle and payload annotations; cover both backend types and A/B import orders.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5a6142efee
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e817e46706
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d72e97e088
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e5711f7795
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 81e9f09cc6
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 249924a3a8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b1cf5297e2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 91a63d2e3e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2f6e4aea81
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e029e90d1d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b3ed0dadb4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
ThreadDesk 0.2 ergänzt die freigegebenen Papierkorb-, Graph-, Bibliotheks-, Bedien- und Backupfunktionen. Oberfläche, CLI und MCP verwenden dieselben workspacegebundenen Fachhandler mit Revisions-, Konflikt- und Wiederholungsschutz. KiraBridge bleibt unverändert.
Gepushter Prüfstand:
145cbbd7e9d4d598809046de73aebe9687743c5e. Der bestehende Importpfad holt nachsource_changed_after_copyund einem anschließend erfolgreich verifizierten Wiederholungsimport fehlende Aktivitätsevidenz nach. Er bewahrt bereits verifizierte Zeit-/Operationsidentitäten auch aus reinen Historyquittungen sowie inzwischen geänderte Ownerzuordnungen. Vorhandene complete Jobs werden unverändert wiedergegeben; es wird keine automatische rückwirkende Reparatur ohne tatsächliche Dateiprüfung behauptet. Alle derzeit bekannten Reviewpunkte sind gelöst.Validierung: Der vorherige Pin
2f6e4aebestand zweimal jeweils 2.377 Tests ohne Fehler oder Skips (CI 41003824290), beide macOS-Builds und Linux-TLS-Restore. Die abschließenden Zentrum-/Kamerafälle bestanden 66 gezielte Tests sowie 13 unabhängige Fälle mit tatsächlichen Client-ACKs auf JSON/SQLite und SVG/Sigma. Der Konfliktdigest bestand 236 gezielte und 26 unabhängige Fälle. Der Importfix bestand 118 gezielte Fälle und 20 unabhängige Fälle ohne Fehler oder Skips, einschließlich originaler fehlerhafter Altquittungen auf JSON/SQLite. Der Einzeilen-Referenzfix bestand 152 gezielte Fälle und acht unabhängige Public-Command-/Legacyfälle ohne Fehler oder Skips. Die vollständige doppelte CI am endgültigen Quellpin 145cbbd (41010668496) ist bestanden: zweimal jeweils 2.453 Tests, 0 Fehler, 0 Skips. Beide macOS-Builds und Linux-TLS-Restore sind grün; alle 22 Reviewthreads sind gelöst. Der globale Jobdeckel beträgt anhand gemessener Vollsuite und zusätzlicher Browserfälle 55 Minuten; beide Pflichtläufe, individuelle Zeitgrenzen, Assertions und Fehler-/Skipgates bleiben unverändert.Quellabschnitte wurden vor Änderungen gesichert und rückgelesen. Beide bestehenden v3-Vollarchive sowie das v2-Brainstormarchiv bleiben lesbar; der aktuelle native Desktopexport (SHA67a10a45…) ist mit Hashmanifest, vollständigem isolierten Restore und Readback von 28.237 Dateien, 9.806 Verzeichnissen, 1.233 inerten Links sowie allen 16 Brainstorm-CAS-Ergebnissen geprüft. Dies ist ein Zeitpunktbeleg, kein quiescenter Vorinstallationscapture. Datierte Integrationsbelege:
docs/evidence/backup-integration-20261029/. Vollständige lokale Prüfbelege, XMLs, Sicherungen und Paketprüfwerkzeuge:/Users/landjunge/ThreadDesk-Backups/app-finish-20261029/.Nach bestandener finaler CI und regulärem Merge wird die bestehende Tauri-App aus dem tatsächlichen main-Pin gebaut und am Paket abgenommen: Quell-/Ressourcenidentität, native Oberfläche, tatsächlicher ChatGPT-Connectorprincipal, Room-Netzwerk und isolierter vollständiger Restore. Vor Installation folgen aktueller quiescenter Backupreadback und danach Datenerhaltprüfung. Der Mac ist inzwischen tatsächlich entsperrt und der authentifizierte ChatGPT-Terminaltransport verfügbar. Finale native Paketabnahme und Installation folgen nach dem tatsächlichen main-Bau. Originalthreads werden weder verschoben noch gelöscht.
Grenzen: Historische unterschiedliche Peernormalisierungen und unbekannte Restoregenerationen bleiben sichtbare Konflikte. Bereits unter dem früheren Aliasfehler gespeicherte falsche Trashdigests bleiben konservativ blockiert; sie werden weder umgeschrieben noch pauschal akzeptiert. Auswahl außerhalb des geladenen Graphkontexts wird beim Refresh nach bestehender Regel begrenzt; alte Ansichten ohne gespeichertes Zentrum können die damalige Klickreihenfolge nicht rekonstruieren. Windows ist pausiert. Lokale Tauri-Abnahme gilt für diesen Intel-Mac, ohne Developer-ID/Notarisierung. KEY-Proben verwenden eine validierte synthetische IWA-ZIP-Fixture und behaupten keine Apple-Keynote-Renderfidelity. Internet-Teamabnahme, Mobile, semantisches Gedächtnis und neue Workshopfunktionen sind nicht Bestandteil. Das vorgeschlagene 2-Sekunden-Ziel für den kalten 1.000-Knoten-WK-Start wurde im datierten Versuch nicht erreicht. SQLite-Purge behauptet keine physische Vernichtung freier Snapshotbytes.