[oliverpool]

Codeberg is running on Forgejo, however it would be better to advertise compatibility with the underlying software than with this specific deployment.

fixes https://code.ffmpeg.org/actions/git-backporting/commit/a7004ff4d9427fc59afcaf21e6d7bdf08f48f861 (cc @BtbN ;)

Description

This add Forgejo as a git platform (software run by codeberg.org and other organisations).
The auto-detection should work when run inside Forgejo Actions.

(Ideally all references to Codeberg should be removed in favor of Forgejo, but this would be a much bigger undertaking...)

How Has This Been Tested?

Running FORGEJO_SERVER_URL=http://localhost node ./dist/cli/index.js succeeds (but fails without the env var), when targeting Forgejo (apart from codeberg).

Checklist

• Tests added if applicable.
• Documentation updated if applicable.

Merge criteria:

• The commits and have meaningful messages; the author will squash them after approval or will ask to merge with squash.
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

Note: dist/cli/index.js and dist/gha/index.js are automatically generated by git hooks and gh workflows.

[github-actions]

Coverage report

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟢	Statements	87.68% (-0.29% 🔻)	655/747
🟢	Branches	81.72% (-0.6% 🔻)	313/383
🟢	Functions	85.56%	154/180
🟢	Lines	87.78% (-0.3% 🔻)	632/720

Show files with reduced coverage 🔻

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟢	... / github-client.ts	83.49%	72.13% (-0.45% 🔻)	68%	84.62%
🟢	git/git-util.ts	94.55% (-5.45% 🔻)	86.21% (-9.79% 🔻)	100%	94% (-6% 🔻)

Test suite run success

230 tests passing in 19 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 4c80ff3

[lampajr]

Hey @oliverpool , sorry for the late reply!

(Ideally all references to Codeberg should be removed in favor of Forgejo, but this would be a much bigger undertaking...)

Indeed, as long as Codeberg is feature-equivalent with the base Forgejo and there is no specific customization I agree with this - but this might be slightly trickier as I'd like to be either backward compatible or properly plan in to start a new major version removing codeberg

[oliverpool]

Don't worry about the delay :), yes Codeberg is Forgejo with some minor adjustments (mostly visual).

Maybe it should be deprecated (removing it might be too much effort for not much gain).