Skip to content

RTECO-2743 - Use replace for jfrog-cli-artifactory to test oras-go v2.7.0 (do not merge) - #3756

Closed
udaykb2 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
RTECO-2743-update-oras-go
Closed

udaykb2 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
RTECO-2743-update-oras-go

Conversation

@udaykb2

@udaykb2 udaykb2 commented Nov 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Do not merge. This PR runs CI with a replace directive for github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-artifactory, pointing to commit 9d24d2675567 (jfrog/jfrog-cli-artifactory#586).

  • The replace line in go.mod is for testing only. The require line is unchanged.
  • It brings in oras.land/oras-go/v2 v2.7.0 (indirect).
  • After the jfrog-cli-artifactory PR is merged, a new PR will update the require line to the merged commit and remove the replace line.

Jira: RTECO-2743

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

….7.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@udaykb2
udaykb2 force-pushed the RTECO-2743-update-oras-go branch from 3a4f277 to 0b53e33 Compare November 5, 2026 07:03
@udaykb2 udaykb2 changed the title RTECO-2743 - Update jfrog-cli-artifactory to pick up oras-go v2.7.0 RTECO-2743 - Use replace for jfrog-cli-artifactory to test oras-go v2.7.0 (do not merge) Nov 5, 2026

@agrasth agrasth left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM — test-rig scope confirmed. The diff only enables the replace directive for jfrog-cli-artifactory at commit 9d24d2675567 and brings in the matching go.sum hashes; no source change. The PR body and title both say do not merge, so approval is for the CI validation gate only — the real bump must land through a tagged jfrog-cli-artifactory release with the replace line removed.

@udaykb2 udaykb2 closed this Nov 6, 2026

This branch is waiting to be deployed

1 waiting deployment
build-gate — 0b53e336 Waiting Nov 5, 2026 by udaykb2 via Approval gate #1340
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants