Skip to content

Added jf rbs command and its unit tesst - #3161

Closed
naveenku-jfrog wants to merge 30 commits into
jfrog:masterfrom
naveenku-jfrog:feature/RTECO-456-Implement-Groups-API-amnd-versions-API-and-its-test
Closed

naveenku-jfrog wants to merge 30 commits into
jfrog:masterfrom
naveenku-jfrog:feature/RTECO-456-Implement-Groups-API-amnd-versions-API-and-its-test

Conversation

@naveenku-jfrog

@naveenku-jfrog naveenku-jfrog commented Oct 14, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
  • All tests have passed. If this feature is not already covered by the tests, new tests have been added.
  • The pull request is targeting the master branch.
  • The code has been validated to compile successfully by running go vet ./....
  • The code has been formatted properly using go fmt ./....

what: Added jfrog-client-go and jfrog-cli-artifactory versions in go.mod and go.sum to include jf rbs command and also added integration tests.
Depend on other PRs: Yes,

  1. https://github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-artifactory/pull/279/commits
  2. Feature/rteco 456 implement groups api amnd versions ap is jfrog-client-go#1246

@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 14, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 14, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 14, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@ehl-jf ehl-jf added the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the safe to test Approve running integration tests on a pull request label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 Frogbot scanned this pull request and did not find any new security issues.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants