Housekeeping#9
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…standalone file. Also, adding tests.
msdemlei
force-pushed
the
housekeeping-update
branch
from
728b476 to
a5ce0f1
Compare
gmantele
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2025
gmantele
left a comment
gmantele
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clearly no opposition to this cleaning operation.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR does three things:
(a) it updates the CI
(b) it adds tests
(c) it removes the formatted sample file from the PDF, instead linking to an auxiliary, standalong file.
The latter thing may be considered a non-housekeeping thing; but then wasting all these pages for something folks will want to have machine-readable anyway does seem a bad idea, and the content is largely unmodified; we just don't throw out the majority of UDFs any more.
(This material has been part of PR #8 so far, but it doesn't really belong to it. I'll rebase PR #8 on this once it's merged, which will make the diff look a lot less cluttered)