Payment service providers - #770
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Also adapt the operator API logic to match the others. Considering only files is safer than skipping directories.
phylor
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 15, 2026 16:01
tom-ioki
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2026
Only relevant if multiple class names are passed in an array.
Collaborator
Author
|
@tom-ioki Please have another look into 54f00a4. Had to change the definition and fix the parsing of the class names. Sorry! The problem was that for class names in an array, we only considered the last part of the |
Contributor
Ah I see! Alright 👍 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds models for payment service providers to platform, operator and passenger API.
Also adds support for nested models in the platform API.